“Dominion status”: History, framework and context

Abstract This article attempts to explain “Dominion status” by various means. First, it notes that the word “Dominion” has had different meanings over time, even though it is most closely associated with the status acquired by Australia, Canada, Ireland, Newfoundland, New Zealand, and South Africa i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Constitutional Law
Main Author: Oliver, Peter C
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2019
Subjects:
Law
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz078
http://academic.oup.com/icon/article-pdf/17/4/1173/31889557/moz078.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icon/moz078
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icon/moz078 2024-01-28T10:07:19+01:00 “Dominion status”: History, framework and context Oliver, Peter C 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz078 http://academic.oup.com/icon/article-pdf/17/4/1173/31889557/moz078.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model International Journal of Constitutional Law volume 17, issue 4, page 1173-1191 ISSN 1474-2640 1474-2659 Law journal-article 2019 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz078 2023-12-29T09:37:00Z Abstract This article attempts to explain “Dominion status” by various means. First, it notes that the word “Dominion” has had different meanings over time, even though it is most closely associated with the status acquired by Australia, Canada, Ireland, Newfoundland, New Zealand, and South Africa in the years 1926 to 1931. Second, Dominion status from 1926 to 1931 is compared to the constitutional claims made a century and a half earlier by American colonists. Third, Dominion Status as of 1931 is explained by way of comparison with what came before, paying particular attention to issues of repugnancy, extraterritoriality, reservation and disallowance. And, finally, this article observes the importance of constitutional conventions throughout. Article in Journal/Newspaper Newfoundland Oxford University Press (via Crossref) Canada New Zealand International Journal of Constitutional Law 17 4 1173 1191
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
topic Law
spellingShingle Law
Oliver, Peter C
“Dominion status”: History, framework and context
topic_facet Law
description Abstract This article attempts to explain “Dominion status” by various means. First, it notes that the word “Dominion” has had different meanings over time, even though it is most closely associated with the status acquired by Australia, Canada, Ireland, Newfoundland, New Zealand, and South Africa in the years 1926 to 1931. Second, Dominion status from 1926 to 1931 is compared to the constitutional claims made a century and a half earlier by American colonists. Third, Dominion Status as of 1931 is explained by way of comparison with what came before, paying particular attention to issues of repugnancy, extraterritoriality, reservation and disallowance. And, finally, this article observes the importance of constitutional conventions throughout.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Oliver, Peter C
author_facet Oliver, Peter C
author_sort Oliver, Peter C
title “Dominion status”: History, framework and context
title_short “Dominion status”: History, framework and context
title_full “Dominion status”: History, framework and context
title_fullStr “Dominion status”: History, framework and context
title_full_unstemmed “Dominion status”: History, framework and context
title_sort “dominion status”: history, framework and context
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz078
http://academic.oup.com/icon/article-pdf/17/4/1173/31889557/moz078.pdf
geographic Canada
New Zealand
geographic_facet Canada
New Zealand
genre Newfoundland
genre_facet Newfoundland
op_source International Journal of Constitutional Law
volume 17, issue 4, page 1173-1191
ISSN 1474-2640 1474-2659
op_rights https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moz078
container_title International Journal of Constitutional Law
container_volume 17
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1173
op_container_end_page 1191
_version_ 1789334868887339008