International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management

Abstract The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Marshak, Anthony R., Link, Jason S., Shuford, Rebecca, Monaco, Mark E., Johannesen, Ellen, Bianchi, Gabriella, Anderson, M. Robin, Olsen, Erik, Smith, David C., Schmidt, Joern O., Dickey-Collas, Mark
Other Authors: Prellezo, Raúl
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/74/1/414/31244132/fsw214.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 2024-09-15T18:23:29+00:00 International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management Marshak, Anthony R. Link, Jason S. Shuford, Rebecca Monaco, Mark E. Johannesen, Ellen Bianchi, Gabriella Anderson, M. Robin Olsen, Erik Smith, David C. Schmidt, Joern O. Dickey-Collas, Mark Prellezo, Raúl 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/74/1/414/31244132/fsw214.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model ICES Journal of Marine Science volume 74, issue 1, page 414-420 ISSN 1054-3139 1095-9289 journal-article 2016 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214 2024-08-19T04:23:06Z Abstract The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants’ perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i.e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Oxford University Press ICES Journal of Marine Science 74 1 414 420
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description Abstract The Ecosystem Approach to Management (EAM) has emerged over the past decades, largely to promote biodiversity conservation, and more recently sectoral tradeoffs in the management of marine ecosystems. To ascertain the state of practice of EAM operationalization, a workshop was held, which included a pre-workshop online survey. The survey gauged international participants’ perspectives regarding capacity, knowledge, and application of EAM. When asked about the subject, most survey respondents had a general understanding of EAM, and provided a clear definition. Major perceived challenges to EAM objectives by those surveyed included limited knowledge, conflicting interests, insufficient communication, and limited organizational legal frameworks or governance structures. Of those directly involved in an ecosystem approach, the majority responded that processes were in place or developed for application of integrated knowledge toward assessing key issues within their respective sectors (i.e. fisheries, conservation, energy), and that capacity was generally high. Our results show that most respondents, irrespective of sector or geography, see value in considering an integrated, broader ecosystem approach as they manage their sector. Although many participants were from the North Atlantic region, our results suggest that much of the international community is converging toward continued understanding of broad-scale, integrated approaches to marine resource management.
author2 Prellezo, Raúl
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Joern O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
spellingShingle Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Joern O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
author_facet Marshak, Anthony R.
Link, Jason S.
Shuford, Rebecca
Monaco, Mark E.
Johannesen, Ellen
Bianchi, Gabriella
Anderson, M. Robin
Olsen, Erik
Smith, David C.
Schmidt, Joern O.
Dickey-Collas, Mark
author_sort Marshak, Anthony R.
title International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
title_short International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
title_full International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
title_fullStr International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
title_full_unstemmed International perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
title_sort international perceptions of an integrated, multi-sectoral, ecosystem approach to management
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/74/1/414/31244132/fsw214.pdf
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source ICES Journal of Marine Science
volume 74, issue 1, page 414-420
ISSN 1054-3139 1095-9289
op_rights https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw214
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science
container_volume 74
container_issue 1
container_start_page 414
op_container_end_page 420
_version_ 1810463697670242304