Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England

A mismatch between the scale of fishery management units and biological population structure can potentially result in a misperception of the productivity and sustainable yield of fish stocks. We used simulation modelling as a tool to compare the perception of productivity, stability, and sustainabi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ICES Journal of Marine Science
Main Authors: Kerr, Lisa A., Cadrin, Steven X., Kovach, Adrienne I.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu113
http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/71/6/1366/29147503/fsu113.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icesjms/fsu113
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/icesjms/fsu113 2024-06-23T07:51:02+00:00 Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England Kerr, Lisa A. Cadrin, Steven X. Kovach, Adrienne I. 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu113 http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/71/6/1366/29147503/fsu113.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) ICES Journal of Marine Science volume 71, issue 6, page 1366-1381 ISSN 1054-3139 1095-9289 journal-article 2014 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu113 2024-06-04T06:13:24Z A mismatch between the scale of fishery management units and biological population structure can potentially result in a misperception of the productivity and sustainable yield of fish stocks. We used simulation modelling as a tool to compare the perception of productivity, stability, and sustainability of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) off New England from an operating model based on the current US management units to a model that more closely reflects the biological complexity of the resource. Two age-structured models were compared: (i) the management unit model, wherein cod were grouped based on the current spatially defined US management areas (Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank), and (ii) the biological unit model, consisting of three genetically defined population components (northern spring spawning, southern winter/spring spawning, and eastern Georges Bank spring-spawning groups). Overall, the regional productivity and maximum sustainable yield of the biological unit model was lower compared with the management unit model. The biological unit model also provided insights on the distribution of productivity in the region, with southern and northern spawning groups being the dominant contributors to the regional spawning–stock biomass and yield and the eastern Georges Bank spawning group being the minority contributor at low to intermediate levels of fishing mortality. The comparison of models revealed that the perception of Atlantic cod derived from the management unit model was of a resource that is more resilient to fishing mortality and not as susceptible to “collapse” as indicated by the biological unit model. For Atlantic cod, one of the main risks of ignoring population structure appears the potential for overexploitation of segments of the population. Consideration of population structure of cod changed our perception of the magnitude and distribution of productivity in the region, suggesting that expectations of sustainable yield of cod in US waters should be reconsidered. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Gadus morhua Oxford University Press ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 6 1366 1381
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description A mismatch between the scale of fishery management units and biological population structure can potentially result in a misperception of the productivity and sustainable yield of fish stocks. We used simulation modelling as a tool to compare the perception of productivity, stability, and sustainability of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) off New England from an operating model based on the current US management units to a model that more closely reflects the biological complexity of the resource. Two age-structured models were compared: (i) the management unit model, wherein cod were grouped based on the current spatially defined US management areas (Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank), and (ii) the biological unit model, consisting of three genetically defined population components (northern spring spawning, southern winter/spring spawning, and eastern Georges Bank spring-spawning groups). Overall, the regional productivity and maximum sustainable yield of the biological unit model was lower compared with the management unit model. The biological unit model also provided insights on the distribution of productivity in the region, with southern and northern spawning groups being the dominant contributors to the regional spawning–stock biomass and yield and the eastern Georges Bank spawning group being the minority contributor at low to intermediate levels of fishing mortality. The comparison of models revealed that the perception of Atlantic cod derived from the management unit model was of a resource that is more resilient to fishing mortality and not as susceptible to “collapse” as indicated by the biological unit model. For Atlantic cod, one of the main risks of ignoring population structure appears the potential for overexploitation of segments of the population. Consideration of population structure of cod changed our perception of the magnitude and distribution of productivity in the region, suggesting that expectations of sustainable yield of cod in US waters should be reconsidered.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Kerr, Lisa A.
Cadrin, Steven X.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
spellingShingle Kerr, Lisa A.
Cadrin, Steven X.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
author_facet Kerr, Lisa A.
Cadrin, Steven X.
Kovach, Adrienne I.
author_sort Kerr, Lisa A.
title Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
title_short Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
title_full Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
title_fullStr Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of Atlantic cod off New England
title_sort consequences of a mismatch between biological and management units on our perception of atlantic cod off new england
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2014
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu113
http://academic.oup.com/icesjms/article-pdf/71/6/1366/29147503/fsu113.pdf
genre atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
genre_facet atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
op_source ICES Journal of Marine Science
volume 71, issue 6, page 1366-1381
ISSN 1054-3139 1095-9289
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu113
container_title ICES Journal of Marine Science
container_volume 71
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1366
op_container_end_page 1381
_version_ 1802642035173228544