Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial

Abstract STUDY QUESTION The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and costs of true natural cycle (true NC-) frozen embryo transfer (FET) using urinary LH tests to modified NC-FET using repeated ultrasound monitoring and ovulation trigger to time FET in the NC. Secondary outcomes a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human Reproduction Open
Main Authors: Zaat, T R, de Bruin, J P, Goddijn, M, van Baal, M, Benneheij, E B, Brandes, E M, Broekmans, F, Cantineau, A E P, Cohlen, B, van Disseldorp, J, Gielen, S C J P, Groenewoud, E R, van Heusden, A, Kaaijk, E M, Koks, C, de Koning, C H, Klijn, N F, Lambalk, C B, van der Linden, P J Q, Manger, P, van Oppenraaij, R H F, Pieterse, Q, Smeenk, J, Visser, J, van Wely, M, Mol, F
Other Authors: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab035
http://academic.oup.com/hropen/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/hropen/hoab035/40499224/hoab035.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/hropen/article-pdf/2021/4/hoab035/44035820/hoab035.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/hropen/hoab035
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/hropen/hoab035 2024-05-19T07:28:53+00:00 Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial Zaat, T R de Bruin, J P Goddijn, M van Baal, M Benneheij, E B Brandes, E M Broekmans, F Cantineau, A E P Cohlen, B van Disseldorp, J Gielen, S C J P Groenewoud, E R van Heusden, A Kaaijk, E M Koks, C de Koning, C H Klijn, N F Lambalk, C B van der Linden, P J Q Manger, P van Oppenraaij, R H F Pieterse, Q Smeenk, J Visser, J van Wely, M Mol, F Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab035 http://academic.oup.com/hropen/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/hropen/hoab035/40499224/hoab035.pdf https://academic.oup.com/hropen/article-pdf/2021/4/hoab035/44035820/hoab035.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Human Reproduction Open volume 2021, issue 4 ISSN 2399-3529 journal-article 2021 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab035 2024-04-25T07:59:51Z Abstract STUDY QUESTION The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and costs of true natural cycle (true NC-) frozen embryo transfer (FET) using urinary LH tests to modified NC-FET using repeated ultrasound monitoring and ovulation trigger to time FET in the NC. Secondary outcomes are the cancellation rates of FET (ovulation before hCG or no dominant follicle, no ovulation by LH urine test, poor embryo survival), pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rates, multiple ongoing pregnancy rates, live birth rates, costs) and neonatal outcomes (including gestational age, birthweight and sex, congenital abnormalities or diseases of babies born). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY FET is at the heart of modern IVF. To allow implantation of the thawed embryo, the endometrium must be prepared either by exogenous oestrogen and progesterone supplementation (artificial cycle (AC)-FET) or by using the NC to produce endogenous oestradiol before and progesterone after ovulation to time the transfer of the thawed embryo (NC-FET). During an NC-FET, women visit the hospital repeatedly and receive an ovulation trigger to time FET (i.e. modified (m)NC-FET or hospital-based monitoring). From the woman’s point of view, a more natural approach using home-based monitoring of the ovulation with LH urine tests to allow a natural ovulation to time FET may be desired (true NC-FET or home-based monitoring). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a multicentre, non-inferiority prospective randomised controlled trial design. Consenting women will undergo one FET cycle using either true NC-FET or mNC-FET based on randomisation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Based on our sample size calculation, the study group will consist of 1464 women between 18 and 45 years old who are scheduled for FET. Women with anovulatory cycles, women who need ovulation induction and women with a contra indication for pregnancy will be excluded. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy. Secondary outcomes are cancellation rates of FET, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Oxford University Press Human Reproduction Open 2021 4
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description Abstract STUDY QUESTION The objective of this trial is to compare the effectiveness and costs of true natural cycle (true NC-) frozen embryo transfer (FET) using urinary LH tests to modified NC-FET using repeated ultrasound monitoring and ovulation trigger to time FET in the NC. Secondary outcomes are the cancellation rates of FET (ovulation before hCG or no dominant follicle, no ovulation by LH urine test, poor embryo survival), pregnancy outcomes (miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rates, multiple ongoing pregnancy rates, live birth rates, costs) and neonatal outcomes (including gestational age, birthweight and sex, congenital abnormalities or diseases of babies born). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY FET is at the heart of modern IVF. To allow implantation of the thawed embryo, the endometrium must be prepared either by exogenous oestrogen and progesterone supplementation (artificial cycle (AC)-FET) or by using the NC to produce endogenous oestradiol before and progesterone after ovulation to time the transfer of the thawed embryo (NC-FET). During an NC-FET, women visit the hospital repeatedly and receive an ovulation trigger to time FET (i.e. modified (m)NC-FET or hospital-based monitoring). From the woman’s point of view, a more natural approach using home-based monitoring of the ovulation with LH urine tests to allow a natural ovulation to time FET may be desired (true NC-FET or home-based monitoring). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a multicentre, non-inferiority prospective randomised controlled trial design. Consenting women will undergo one FET cycle using either true NC-FET or mNC-FET based on randomisation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Based on our sample size calculation, the study group will consist of 1464 women between 18 and 45 years old who are scheduled for FET. Women with anovulatory cycles, women who need ovulation induction and women with a contra indication for pregnancy will be excluded. The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy. Secondary outcomes are cancellation rates of FET, ...
author2 Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Zaat, T R
de Bruin, J P
Goddijn, M
van Baal, M
Benneheij, E B
Brandes, E M
Broekmans, F
Cantineau, A E P
Cohlen, B
van Disseldorp, J
Gielen, S C J P
Groenewoud, E R
van Heusden, A
Kaaijk, E M
Koks, C
de Koning, C H
Klijn, N F
Lambalk, C B
van der Linden, P J Q
Manger, P
van Oppenraaij, R H F
Pieterse, Q
Smeenk, J
Visser, J
van Wely, M
Mol, F
spellingShingle Zaat, T R
de Bruin, J P
Goddijn, M
van Baal, M
Benneheij, E B
Brandes, E M
Broekmans, F
Cantineau, A E P
Cohlen, B
van Disseldorp, J
Gielen, S C J P
Groenewoud, E R
van Heusden, A
Kaaijk, E M
Koks, C
de Koning, C H
Klijn, N F
Lambalk, C B
van der Linden, P J Q
Manger, P
van Oppenraaij, R H F
Pieterse, Q
Smeenk, J
Visser, J
van Wely, M
Mol, F
Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
author_facet Zaat, T R
de Bruin, J P
Goddijn, M
van Baal, M
Benneheij, E B
Brandes, E M
Broekmans, F
Cantineau, A E P
Cohlen, B
van Disseldorp, J
Gielen, S C J P
Groenewoud, E R
van Heusden, A
Kaaijk, E M
Koks, C
de Koning, C H
Klijn, N F
Lambalk, C B
van der Linden, P J Q
Manger, P
van Oppenraaij, R H F
Pieterse, Q
Smeenk, J
Visser, J
van Wely, M
Mol, F
author_sort Zaat, T R
title Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
title_short Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
title_full Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? Study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority Antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
title_sort is home-based monitoring of ovulation to time frozen embryo transfer a cost-effective alternative for hospital-based monitoring of ovulation? study protocol of the multicentre, non-inferiority antarctica-2 randomised controlled trial
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab035
http://academic.oup.com/hropen/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/hropen/hoab035/40499224/hoab035.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/hropen/article-pdf/2021/4/hoab035/44035820/hoab035.pdf
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Human Reproduction Open
volume 2021, issue 4
ISSN 2399-3529
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab035
container_title Human Reproduction Open
container_volume 2021
container_issue 4
_version_ 1799476391602814976