Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect

SUMMARY Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical Journal International
Main Authors: Yi, Shuang, Heki, Kosuke
Other Authors: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
http://academic.oup.com/gji/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/gji/ggaa022/31788015/ggaa022.pdf
http://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/221/1/603/32510938/ggaa022.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/gji/ggaa022
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/gji/ggaa022 2024-09-30T14:31:27+00:00 Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect Yi, Shuang Heki, Kosuke Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Alexander von Humboldt Foundation 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022 http://academic.oup.com/gji/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/gji/ggaa022/31788015/ggaa022.pdf http://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/221/1/603/32510938/ggaa022.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model Geophysical Journal International volume 221, issue 1, page 603-616 ISSN 0956-540X 1365-246X journal-article 2020 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022 2024-09-03T04:10:34Z SUMMARY Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the ocean-to-land leakage. Here, we show that the ocean-to-land leakage is non-uniform and non-negligible and propose a new forward modelling method to fully consider bi-directional leakages with the help of the global Ocean ReAnalysis System ORAS5. This observation-driven model could significantly reduce the variations in ocean grids and thus decrease the ocean-to-land leakage. The results with different treatment of the ocean signal leakage are compared. We find that failing to consider the ocean-to-land leakage will cause an underestimation of ∼20 per cent in the seasonal variation and will introduce a bias of several giga-tons in the secular trend. Although the uniform and non-uniform model have similar results in the global average of seasonal mass variations, the non-uniform ocean model is necessary in most places, especially near the Arctic Ocean, the Sea of Japan and the Gulf of Carpentaria. Despite these achievements, we also point out that there is still much room for improvement in ocean mass models, particularly in long-term trends. Our results indicate the importance of the ocean-to-land leakage correction in the mass estimation in coastal land areas using the GRACE data. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Ocean Oxford University Press Arctic Arctic Ocean Geophysical Journal International 221 1 603 616
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description SUMMARY Signal leakage between the land and ocean is a challenge in using Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) observation data to study global mass redistributions. Although the leakage occurs in both directions, more attention has been paid to the land-to-ocean leakage and less to the ocean-to-land leakage. Here, we show that the ocean-to-land leakage is non-uniform and non-negligible and propose a new forward modelling method to fully consider bi-directional leakages with the help of the global Ocean ReAnalysis System ORAS5. This observation-driven model could significantly reduce the variations in ocean grids and thus decrease the ocean-to-land leakage. The results with different treatment of the ocean signal leakage are compared. We find that failing to consider the ocean-to-land leakage will cause an underestimation of ∼20 per cent in the seasonal variation and will introduce a bias of several giga-tons in the secular trend. Although the uniform and non-uniform model have similar results in the global average of seasonal mass variations, the non-uniform ocean model is necessary in most places, especially near the Arctic Ocean, the Sea of Japan and the Gulf of Carpentaria. Despite these achievements, we also point out that there is still much room for improvement in ocean mass models, particularly in long-term trends. Our results indicate the importance of the ocean-to-land leakage correction in the mass estimation in coastal land areas using the GRACE data.
author2 Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Yi, Shuang
Heki, Kosuke
spellingShingle Yi, Shuang
Heki, Kosuke
Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
author_facet Yi, Shuang
Heki, Kosuke
author_sort Yi, Shuang
title Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_short Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_full Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_fullStr Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in GRACE observations and its leakage effect
title_sort heterogeneous oceanic mass distribution in grace observations and its leakage effect
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
http://academic.oup.com/gji/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/gji/ggaa022/31788015/ggaa022.pdf
http://academic.oup.com/gji/article-pdf/221/1/603/32510938/ggaa022.pdf
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
op_source Geophysical Journal International
volume 221, issue 1, page 603-616
ISSN 0956-540X 1365-246X
op_rights https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa022
container_title Geophysical Journal International
container_volume 221
container_issue 1
container_start_page 603
op_container_end_page 616
_version_ 1811635993450643456