Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry

Abstract Aims Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. Methods This prospective obser...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Europace
Main Authors: Tachibana, Shinichi, Miyazaki, Shinsuke, Nitta, Junichi, Shirai, Yasuhiro, Nagata, Yasutoshi, Sagawa, Yuichiro, Sekiguchi, Yukio, Inamura, Yukihiro, Sasaki, Takeshi, Yamauchi, Yasuteru, Inaba, Osamu, Ono, Yuichi, Suzuki, Makoto, Suzuki, Atsushi, Iwai, Shinsuke, Okada, Hiroyuki, Mizukami, Akira, Azegami, Koji, Hachiya, Hitoshi, Handa, Keita, Goto, Kentaro, Nishimura, Takuro, Hirao, Kenzo, Takahashi, Atsushi, Sasano, Tetsuo
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press (OUP) 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae092
https://academic.oup.com/europace/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/europace/euae092/57184658/euae092.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-pdf/26/4/euae092/57352477/euae092.pdf
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/europace/euae092
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/europace/euae092 2024-05-19T07:36:36+00:00 Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry Tachibana, Shinichi Miyazaki, Shinsuke Nitta, Junichi Shirai, Yasuhiro Nagata, Yasutoshi Sagawa, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, Yukio Inamura, Yukihiro Sasaki, Takeshi Yamauchi, Yasuteru Inaba, Osamu Ono, Yuichi Suzuki, Makoto Suzuki, Atsushi Iwai, Shinsuke Okada, Hiroyuki Mizukami, Akira Azegami, Koji Hachiya, Hitoshi Handa, Keita Goto, Kentaro Nishimura, Takuro Hirao, Kenzo Takahashi, Atsushi Sasano, Tetsuo 2024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae092 https://academic.oup.com/europace/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/europace/euae092/57184658/euae092.pdf https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-pdf/26/4/euae092/57352477/euae092.pdf en eng Oxford University Press (OUP) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Europace volume 26, issue 4 ISSN 1099-5129 1532-2092 journal-article 2024 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae092 2024-05-02T09:30:28Z Abstract Aims Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. Methods This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023. Results Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Oxford University Press Europace 26 4
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language English
description Abstract Aims Phrenic nerve injury (PNI) is the most common complication during cryoballoon ablation. Currently, two cryoballoon systems are available, yet the difference is unclear. We sought to compare the acute procedural efficacy and safety of the two cryoballoons. Methods This prospective observational study consisted of 2,555 consecutive atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using either conventional (Arctic Front Advance) (AFA-CB) or novel cryoballoons (POLARx) (POLARx-CB) at 19 centers between January 2022 and October 2023. Results Among 2,555 patients (68.8 ± 10.9 years, 1,740 men, paroxysmal AF[PAF] 1,670 patients), PVIs were performed by the AFA-CB and POLARx-CB in 1,358 and 1,197 patients, respectively. Touch-up ablation was required in 299(11.7%) patients. The touch-up rate was significantly lower for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (9.5% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.002), especially for right inferior PVs (RIPVs). The touch-up rate was significantly lower for PAF than non-PAF (8.8% vs. 17.2%, P < 0.001) and was similar between the two cryoballoons in non-PAF patients. Right PNI occurred in 64(2.5%) patients and 22(0.9%) were symptomatic. It occurred during the right superior PV (RSPV) ablation in 39(1.5%) patients. The incidence was significantly higher for POLARx-CB than AFA-CB (3.8% vs. 1.3%, P < 0.001) as was the incidence of symptomatic PNI (1.7% vs. 0.1%, P < 0.001). The difference was significant during RSPV (2.5% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001) but not RIPV ablation. The PNI recovered more quickly for the AFA-CB than POLARx-CB. Conclusions Our study demonstrated a significantly higher incidence of right PNI and lower touch-up rate for the POLARx-CB than AFA-CB in the real-world clinical practice.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Tachibana, Shinichi
Miyazaki, Shinsuke
Nitta, Junichi
Shirai, Yasuhiro
Nagata, Yasutoshi
Sagawa, Yuichiro
Sekiguchi, Yukio
Inamura, Yukihiro
Sasaki, Takeshi
Yamauchi, Yasuteru
Inaba, Osamu
Ono, Yuichi
Suzuki, Makoto
Suzuki, Atsushi
Iwai, Shinsuke
Okada, Hiroyuki
Mizukami, Akira
Azegami, Koji
Hachiya, Hitoshi
Handa, Keita
Goto, Kentaro
Nishimura, Takuro
Hirao, Kenzo
Takahashi, Atsushi
Sasano, Tetsuo
spellingShingle Tachibana, Shinichi
Miyazaki, Shinsuke
Nitta, Junichi
Shirai, Yasuhiro
Nagata, Yasutoshi
Sagawa, Yuichiro
Sekiguchi, Yukio
Inamura, Yukihiro
Sasaki, Takeshi
Yamauchi, Yasuteru
Inaba, Osamu
Ono, Yuichi
Suzuki, Makoto
Suzuki, Atsushi
Iwai, Shinsuke
Okada, Hiroyuki
Mizukami, Akira
Azegami, Koji
Hachiya, Hitoshi
Handa, Keita
Goto, Kentaro
Nishimura, Takuro
Hirao, Kenzo
Takahashi, Atsushi
Sasano, Tetsuo
Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
author_facet Tachibana, Shinichi
Miyazaki, Shinsuke
Nitta, Junichi
Shirai, Yasuhiro
Nagata, Yasutoshi
Sagawa, Yuichiro
Sekiguchi, Yukio
Inamura, Yukihiro
Sasaki, Takeshi
Yamauchi, Yasuteru
Inaba, Osamu
Ono, Yuichi
Suzuki, Makoto
Suzuki, Atsushi
Iwai, Shinsuke
Okada, Hiroyuki
Mizukami, Akira
Azegami, Koji
Hachiya, Hitoshi
Handa, Keita
Goto, Kentaro
Nishimura, Takuro
Hirao, Kenzo
Takahashi, Atsushi
Sasano, Tetsuo
author_sort Tachibana, Shinichi
title Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
title_short Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
title_full Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
title_fullStr Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
title_sort incidence of phrenic nerve injury during pulmonary vein isolation using different cryoballoons: data from a large prospective ablation registry
publisher Oxford University Press (OUP)
publishDate 2024
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae092
https://academic.oup.com/europace/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/europace/euae092/57184658/euae092.pdf
https://academic.oup.com/europace/article-pdf/26/4/euae092/57352477/euae092.pdf
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Europace
volume 26, issue 4
ISSN 1099-5129 1532-2092
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae092
container_title Europace
container_volume 26
container_issue 4
_version_ 1799475722259005440