The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis

Throughout the 1900s, the warmth of the current interglaciation was viewed as completely natural in origin (prior to greenhouse-gas emissions during the industrial era). In the view of physical scientists, orbital variations had ended the previous glaciation and caused a warmer climate but had not y...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ruddiman, William
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192 2023-05-15T14:07:19+02:00 The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis Ruddiman, William 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science reference-entry 2016 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192 2022-09-02T09:24:35Z Throughout the 1900s, the warmth of the current interglaciation was viewed as completely natural in origin (prior to greenhouse-gas emissions during the industrial era). In the view of physical scientists, orbital variations had ended the previous glaciation and caused a warmer climate but had not yet brought it to an end. Most historians focused on urban and elite societies, with much less attention to how farmers were altering the land. Historical studies were also constrained by the fact that written records extended back a few hundred to at most 3,500 years. The first years of the new millennium saw a major challenge to the ruling paradigm. Evidence from deep ice drilling in Antarctica showed that the early stages of the three interglaciations prior to the current one were marked by decreases in concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) that must have been natural in origin. During the earliest part of the current (Holocene) interglaciation, gas concentrations initially showed similar decreases, but then rose during the last 7,000–5,000 years. These anomalous (“wrong-way”) trends are interpreted by many scientists as anthropogenic, with support from scattered evidence of deforestation (which increases atmospheric CO2) by the first farmers and early, irrigated rice agriculture (which emits CH4). During a subsequent interval of scientific give-and-take, several papers have criticized this new hypothesis. The most common objection has been that there were too few people living millennia ago to have had large effects on greenhouse gases and climate. Several land-use simulations estimate that CO2 emissions from pre-industrial forest clearance amounted to just a few parts per million (ppm), far less than the 40 ppm estimate in the early anthropogenic hypothesis. Other critics have suggested that, during the best orbital analog to the current interglaciation, about 400,000 years ago, interglacial warmth persisted for 26,000 years, compared to the 10,000-year duration of the current interglaciation ... Book Part Antarc* Antarctica Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Throughout the 1900s, the warmth of the current interglaciation was viewed as completely natural in origin (prior to greenhouse-gas emissions during the industrial era). In the view of physical scientists, orbital variations had ended the previous glaciation and caused a warmer climate but had not yet brought it to an end. Most historians focused on urban and elite societies, with much less attention to how farmers were altering the land. Historical studies were also constrained by the fact that written records extended back a few hundred to at most 3,500 years. The first years of the new millennium saw a major challenge to the ruling paradigm. Evidence from deep ice drilling in Antarctica showed that the early stages of the three interglaciations prior to the current one were marked by decreases in concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) that must have been natural in origin. During the earliest part of the current (Holocene) interglaciation, gas concentrations initially showed similar decreases, but then rose during the last 7,000–5,000 years. These anomalous (“wrong-way”) trends are interpreted by many scientists as anthropogenic, with support from scattered evidence of deforestation (which increases atmospheric CO2) by the first farmers and early, irrigated rice agriculture (which emits CH4). During a subsequent interval of scientific give-and-take, several papers have criticized this new hypothesis. The most common objection has been that there were too few people living millennia ago to have had large effects on greenhouse gases and climate. Several land-use simulations estimate that CO2 emissions from pre-industrial forest clearance amounted to just a few parts per million (ppm), far less than the 40 ppm estimate in the early anthropogenic hypothesis. Other critics have suggested that, during the best orbital analog to the current interglaciation, about 400,000 years ago, interglacial warmth persisted for 26,000 years, compared to the 10,000-year duration of the current interglaciation ...
format Book Part
author Ruddiman, William
spellingShingle Ruddiman, William
The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
author_facet Ruddiman, William
author_sort Ruddiman, William
title The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
title_short The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
title_full The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
title_fullStr The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed The Early Anthropogenic Hypothesis
title_sort early anthropogenic hypothesis
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Environmental Science
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199389414.013.192
_version_ 1766279221021245440