Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism
The Japanese colonial empire was composed of territories adjacent to the Japanese archipelago, ranging from Southern Sakhalin in the north to Taiwan in the south. Unlike most European powers, Japan did not acquire colonial territories that were far away from the metropolis; rather, it did so within...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 |
id |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 2023-05-15T18:09:18+02:00 Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism Saaler, Sven 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History reference-entry 2019 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 2022-09-02T09:25:18Z The Japanese colonial empire was composed of territories adjacent to the Japanese archipelago, ranging from Southern Sakhalin in the north to Taiwan in the south. Unlike most European powers, Japan did not acquire colonial territories that were far away from the metropolis; rather, it did so within the region in which it was located—East Asia. The geographical proximity between the metropolis and its colonial territories influenced not only the structure of the colonial administration, racial hierarchies in the empire, and colonial and metropolitan identities but also the rhetorical strategies that were used to legitimize colonial rule. Although the government generally envisioned a European-style empire, the creation of which would earn Japan the respect of the Great Powers and eventually lead to the recognition of Japanese equality, a significant number of politicians, writers, and activists argued that it was Japan’s mission to unite the Asian people and protect or liberate them from Western colonial rule. These discourses have been summarized under the term “Pan-Asianism,” a movement and an ideology that emerged in the late 19th century and became mainstream by the time World War I began. However, although some advocates of Pan-Asianism were motivated by sincere feelings of solidarity, the expansion of Japanese colonial rule and the escalation of war in China and throughout Asia in the 1930s brought to the fore an increasing number of contradictions and ambiguities. By the time World War II started, Pan-Asianism had become a cloak of Japanese expansionism and an instrument to legitimize the empire, a process that culminated in the Greater East Asia Conference of 1943. The contradictions between Japan’s brutal wars in Asia and the ideology of Asian solidarity continue to haunt that country’s relations with its neighbors, by way of ambiguous historical memories of the empire and war in contemporary Japanese politics and society. Book Part Sakhalin Oxford University Press (via Crossref) |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Oxford University Press (via Crossref) |
op_collection_id |
croxfordunivpr |
language |
unknown |
description |
The Japanese colonial empire was composed of territories adjacent to the Japanese archipelago, ranging from Southern Sakhalin in the north to Taiwan in the south. Unlike most European powers, Japan did not acquire colonial territories that were far away from the metropolis; rather, it did so within the region in which it was located—East Asia. The geographical proximity between the metropolis and its colonial territories influenced not only the structure of the colonial administration, racial hierarchies in the empire, and colonial and metropolitan identities but also the rhetorical strategies that were used to legitimize colonial rule. Although the government generally envisioned a European-style empire, the creation of which would earn Japan the respect of the Great Powers and eventually lead to the recognition of Japanese equality, a significant number of politicians, writers, and activists argued that it was Japan’s mission to unite the Asian people and protect or liberate them from Western colonial rule. These discourses have been summarized under the term “Pan-Asianism,” a movement and an ideology that emerged in the late 19th century and became mainstream by the time World War I began. However, although some advocates of Pan-Asianism were motivated by sincere feelings of solidarity, the expansion of Japanese colonial rule and the escalation of war in China and throughout Asia in the 1930s brought to the fore an increasing number of contradictions and ambiguities. By the time World War II started, Pan-Asianism had become a cloak of Japanese expansionism and an instrument to legitimize the empire, a process that culminated in the Greater East Asia Conference of 1943. The contradictions between Japan’s brutal wars in Asia and the ideology of Asian solidarity continue to haunt that country’s relations with its neighbors, by way of ambiguous historical memories of the empire and war in contemporary Japanese politics and society. |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Saaler, Sven |
spellingShingle |
Saaler, Sven Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
author_facet |
Saaler, Sven |
author_sort |
Saaler, Sven |
title |
Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
title_short |
Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
title_full |
Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
title_fullStr |
Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Japanese Empire and Pan-Asianism |
title_sort |
japanese empire and pan-asianism |
publisher |
Oxford University Press |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 |
genre |
Sakhalin |
genre_facet |
Sakhalin |
op_source |
Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Asian History |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277727.013.373 |
_version_ |
1766181788754903040 |