Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities

Persons with intellectual disability (ID) exhibit reduced levels of participation in recreational and habitual physical activity, which leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and resulting medical and psychosocial burdens. In spite of their cognitive limitations, persons with ID are a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hutzler, Yeshayahu, Almosni, Joelle
Format: Book Part
Language:unknown
Published: Oxford University Press 2019
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328
id croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328
record_format openpolar
spelling croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328 2023-05-15T16:01:46+02:00 Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities Hutzler, Yeshayahu Almosni, Joelle 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328 unknown Oxford University Press Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology reference-entry 2019 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328 2022-09-02T09:24:33Z Persons with intellectual disability (ID) exhibit reduced levels of participation in recreational and habitual physical activity, which leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and resulting medical and psychosocial burdens. In spite of their cognitive limitations, persons with ID are able to benefit from utilization of learner-centered approaches to physical activity participation. Several theoretical models, including social cognitive theory (SCT), self-determination theory (SDT), and constructivism, are helpful for explaining the benefits of internalizing learning within the framework of physical activity in persons with ID. Peer modeling, decision-making for leisure (DML), divergent production style (DPS), and the cycle of internalization (CIL) are practical teaching models focusing on internalizing learning experiences and developing an intrinsic motivation for action in the physical domain. These models have been successfully practiced in persons with ID, and their feasibility and effectiveness was established particularly for developing autonomy and social relatedness. In this article the theoretical constructs and the research literature pertaining to SCT, DML, DPS and CIL is reviewed, enabling to synthesize perspectives on how to integrate these models within residential, vocational or community based physical activity programs for persons with ID. Utilizing such models and practices may facilitate persons with ID developing an internalized motivational approach to participation in physical activity and therefore be beneficial for reducing risk factors, keeping fit and enhance quality of life. Staff members in community residences and homes for persons with ID as well as in day-care and vocational centers, should be encouraged to utilize such models as an alternative to the widely used directive teaching model following the behaviorist approach. Book Part DML Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection Oxford University Press (via Crossref)
op_collection_id croxfordunivpr
language unknown
description Persons with intellectual disability (ID) exhibit reduced levels of participation in recreational and habitual physical activity, which leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and resulting medical and psychosocial burdens. In spite of their cognitive limitations, persons with ID are able to benefit from utilization of learner-centered approaches to physical activity participation. Several theoretical models, including social cognitive theory (SCT), self-determination theory (SDT), and constructivism, are helpful for explaining the benefits of internalizing learning within the framework of physical activity in persons with ID. Peer modeling, decision-making for leisure (DML), divergent production style (DPS), and the cycle of internalization (CIL) are practical teaching models focusing on internalizing learning experiences and developing an intrinsic motivation for action in the physical domain. These models have been successfully practiced in persons with ID, and their feasibility and effectiveness was established particularly for developing autonomy and social relatedness. In this article the theoretical constructs and the research literature pertaining to SCT, DML, DPS and CIL is reviewed, enabling to synthesize perspectives on how to integrate these models within residential, vocational or community based physical activity programs for persons with ID. Utilizing such models and practices may facilitate persons with ID developing an internalized motivational approach to participation in physical activity and therefore be beneficial for reducing risk factors, keeping fit and enhance quality of life. Staff members in community residences and homes for persons with ID as well as in day-care and vocational centers, should be encouraged to utilize such models as an alternative to the widely used directive teaching model following the behaviorist approach.
format Book Part
author Hutzler, Yeshayahu
Almosni, Joelle
spellingShingle Hutzler, Yeshayahu
Almosni, Joelle
Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
author_facet Hutzler, Yeshayahu
Almosni, Joelle
author_sort Hutzler, Yeshayahu
title Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
title_short Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
title_full Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
title_fullStr Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Considerations for Physical Activity Participants With Intellectual Disabilities
title_sort psychological considerations for physical activity participants with intellectual disabilities
publisher Oxford University Press
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.328
_version_ 1766397497570230272