Syntactic Change
Abstract Differences in syntactic projection result from changes in lexical features, e.g. by reanalysis. In West Greenlandic factives, subject‐to‐object raising was lost along with the Agree relation that accompanied the edge/EPP feature. Factives also figure prominently in the reanalysis of Latin...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Book Part |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University PressOxford
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 https://academic.oup.com/book/27427/chapter/197288075 |
id |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
croxfordunivpr:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 2024-05-19T07:27:56+00:00 Syntactic Change Miller, D. Gary 2010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 https://academic.oup.com/book/27427/chapter/197288075 en eng Oxford University PressOxford Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume II page 230-266 ISBN 0199583439 9780199583430 9780191595288 book-chapter 2010 croxfordunivpr https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 2024-05-02T09:31:38Z Abstract Differences in syntactic projection result from changes in lexical features, e.g. by reanalysis. In West Greenlandic factives, subject‐to‐object raising was lost along with the Agree relation that accompanied the edge/EPP feature. Factives also figure prominently in the reanalysis of Latin quod ‘which; because’ to a complementizer ‘that’. Copular deontics originate as passives. In Latin and English, the nominative/accusative case ambiguity of neuters permitted reanalysis to active structures. With non‐neuters, the passive was retained in English and took the new passive infinitive. English preposition doubling (the teacher to whom I gave the book to) is a hypercorrection formalized as failure of copy‐remnant deletion. Split ergativity in Pašto and the Northern Group of Kurdish evolved from frequent use of the perfect passive with an agent phrase that had (quirky) subject properties since Old Persian. The predilection for nominalizations in the Eskimo‐Aleut family is responsible for several chronological layers of ergativity. Book Part aleut eskimo* Eskimo–Aleut greenlandic Oxford University Press |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Oxford University Press |
op_collection_id |
croxfordunivpr |
language |
English |
description |
Abstract Differences in syntactic projection result from changes in lexical features, e.g. by reanalysis. In West Greenlandic factives, subject‐to‐object raising was lost along with the Agree relation that accompanied the edge/EPP feature. Factives also figure prominently in the reanalysis of Latin quod ‘which; because’ to a complementizer ‘that’. Copular deontics originate as passives. In Latin and English, the nominative/accusative case ambiguity of neuters permitted reanalysis to active structures. With non‐neuters, the passive was retained in English and took the new passive infinitive. English preposition doubling (the teacher to whom I gave the book to) is a hypercorrection formalized as failure of copy‐remnant deletion. Split ergativity in Pašto and the Northern Group of Kurdish evolved from frequent use of the perfect passive with an agent phrase that had (quirky) subject properties since Old Persian. The predilection for nominalizations in the Eskimo‐Aleut family is responsible for several chronological layers of ergativity. |
format |
Book Part |
author |
Miller, D. Gary |
spellingShingle |
Miller, D. Gary Syntactic Change |
author_facet |
Miller, D. Gary |
author_sort |
Miller, D. Gary |
title |
Syntactic Change |
title_short |
Syntactic Change |
title_full |
Syntactic Change |
title_fullStr |
Syntactic Change |
title_full_unstemmed |
Syntactic Change |
title_sort |
syntactic change |
publisher |
Oxford University PressOxford |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 https://academic.oup.com/book/27427/chapter/197288075 |
genre |
aleut eskimo* Eskimo–Aleut greenlandic |
genre_facet |
aleut eskimo* Eskimo–Aleut greenlandic |
op_source |
Language Change and Linguistic Theory, Volume II page 230-266 ISBN 0199583439 9780199583430 9780191595288 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199583430.003.0010 |
_version_ |
1799470022594134016 |