Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology

Background and Purpose Ultrasonography is increasingly used in vascular research, but there is limited information about the reproducibility of the ultrasound method for screening purposes. In this study the reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morpho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke
Main Authors: Joakimsen, Oddmund, Bønaa, Kaare H., Stensland-Bugge, Eva
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2201
id crovidcr:10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201
record_format openpolar
spelling crovidcr:10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201 2024-09-15T18:39:23+00:00 Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology The Tromsø Study Joakimsen, Oddmund Bønaa, Kaare H. Stensland-Bugge, Eva 1997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2201 en eng Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) Stroke volume 28, issue 11, page 2201-2207 ISSN 0039-2499 1524-4628 journal-article 1997 crovidcr https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201 2024-09-05T04:58:58Z Background and Purpose Ultrasonography is increasingly used in vascular research, but there is limited information about the reproducibility of the ultrasound method for screening purposes. In this study the reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morphology was examined within the setting of a population health survey. Methods In 1994/1995, 6720 participants in the Tromsø Study, Norway, underwent B-mode ultrasound scanning of the right carotid artery. The between- and within-sonographer reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of plaque occurrence and thickness was estimated by repeated scanning of a random sample of 107 participants. The between- and within-sonographer reproducibility of plaque morphology classification (echogenicity, four categories and heterogeneity, two categories) was determined by repeated reading of videotaped images of 119 randomly selected arteries with plaques. Results Between- and within-sonographer agreement on plaque occurrence was substantial with κ values (95% CI) of 0.72 (0.60 to 0.84) and 0.76 (0.63 to 0.89), respectively. Reproducibility of plaque thickness measurements was moderate, with mean absolute differences ranging between 0.25 and 0.55 mm (coefficients of variation between 13.8% and 22.4%). Agreement on plaque morphology classification was high, with κ values ranging between 0.54 and 0.73. Conclusions Population screening using B-mode ultrasound provides a valuable means for the detection and morphological evaluation of carotid plaques, whereas measurements of plaque thickness are subject to considerable measurement error. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tromsø Ovid Stroke 28 11 2201 2207
institution Open Polar
collection Ovid
op_collection_id crovidcr
language English
description Background and Purpose Ultrasonography is increasingly used in vascular research, but there is limited information about the reproducibility of the ultrasound method for screening purposes. In this study the reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morphology was examined within the setting of a population health survey. Methods In 1994/1995, 6720 participants in the Tromsø Study, Norway, underwent B-mode ultrasound scanning of the right carotid artery. The between- and within-sonographer reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of plaque occurrence and thickness was estimated by repeated scanning of a random sample of 107 participants. The between- and within-sonographer reproducibility of plaque morphology classification (echogenicity, four categories and heterogeneity, two categories) was determined by repeated reading of videotaped images of 119 randomly selected arteries with plaques. Results Between- and within-sonographer agreement on plaque occurrence was substantial with κ values (95% CI) of 0.72 (0.60 to 0.84) and 0.76 (0.63 to 0.89), respectively. Reproducibility of plaque thickness measurements was moderate, with mean absolute differences ranging between 0.25 and 0.55 mm (coefficients of variation between 13.8% and 22.4%). Agreement on plaque morphology classification was high, with κ values ranging between 0.54 and 0.73. Conclusions Population screening using B-mode ultrasound provides a valuable means for the detection and morphological evaluation of carotid plaques, whereas measurements of plaque thickness are subject to considerable measurement error.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
Stensland-Bugge, Eva
spellingShingle Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
Stensland-Bugge, Eva
Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
author_facet Joakimsen, Oddmund
Bønaa, Kaare H.
Stensland-Bugge, Eva
author_sort Joakimsen, Oddmund
title Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
title_short Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
title_full Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
title_fullStr Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility of Ultrasound Assessment of Carotid Plaque Occurrence, Thickness, and Morphology
title_sort reproducibility of ultrasound assessment of carotid plaque occurrence, thickness, and morphology
publisher Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
publishDate 1997
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.STR.28.11.2201
genre Tromsø
genre_facet Tromsø
op_source Stroke
volume 28, issue 11, page 2201-2207
ISSN 0039-2499 1524-4628
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.28.11.2201
container_title Stroke
container_volume 28
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2201
op_container_end_page 2207
_version_ 1810483769377816576