James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing

It Is a paradox that James Joyce, exemplar of the artist-as-exile, was one of the most domestic of modern writers—“very much a family man, a devoted husband, a good father, and a loyal son.” For Stephen Dedalus, the artist as young man, the artist as family man would have seemed a contradiction in t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America
Main Author: Beebe, Maurice
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Modern Language Association (MLA) 1956
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/460705
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0030812900011068
id crmla:10.2307/460705
record_format openpolar
spelling crmla:10.2307/460705 2024-06-09T07:45:02+00:00 James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing Beebe, Maurice 1956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/460705 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0030812900011068 en eng Modern Language Association (MLA) https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America volume 71, issue 3, page 302-320 ISSN 0030-8129 1938-1530 journal-article 1956 crmla https://doi.org/10.2307/460705 2024-05-16T14:04:40Z It Is a paradox that James Joyce, exemplar of the artist-as-exile, was one of the most domestic of modern writers—“very much a family man, a devoted husband, a good father, and a loyal son.” For Stephen Dedalus, the artist as young man, the artist as family man would have seemed a contradiction in terms. The true artist, Stephen insisted, must free himself from allegiance to home and family as well as country and church. The paradox is no problem for those critics who, dissociating Joyce from his fictional counterpart, consider Stephen less a portrait than a parody of the artist and his theory of art one that Joyce either never took seriously or eventually rejected. If, however, the testimony of Joyce's brother and others who knew him in Dublin may be accepted, the young Joyce was a good deal like Stephen in situation, manners, and temperament; and the ideas on art and artist which appear in Joyce's early essays and notebooks are virtually the same as those expounded by Stephen. This is not to say that the Joyce who wrote A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Ulysses is identical with the Joyce-Stephen presented in the novels. Between the time depicted and the time of writing occurred several events, including his elopement with Nora Barnacle in October 1904, which changed the artist's outlook. Yet, if Joyce looked back on the foibles of his youth with amused detachment and described them with irony, he was ready to admit the relationship between author and hero. “Many writers have written about themselves,” he said to Frank Budgen, “I wonder if any of them has been as candid as I have.” Article in Journal/Newspaper Barnacle goose PMLA - Modern Language Association Publications PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 71 3 302 320
institution Open Polar
collection PMLA - Modern Language Association Publications
op_collection_id crmla
language English
description It Is a paradox that James Joyce, exemplar of the artist-as-exile, was one of the most domestic of modern writers—“very much a family man, a devoted husband, a good father, and a loyal son.” For Stephen Dedalus, the artist as young man, the artist as family man would have seemed a contradiction in terms. The true artist, Stephen insisted, must free himself from allegiance to home and family as well as country and church. The paradox is no problem for those critics who, dissociating Joyce from his fictional counterpart, consider Stephen less a portrait than a parody of the artist and his theory of art one that Joyce either never took seriously or eventually rejected. If, however, the testimony of Joyce's brother and others who knew him in Dublin may be accepted, the young Joyce was a good deal like Stephen in situation, manners, and temperament; and the ideas on art and artist which appear in Joyce's early essays and notebooks are virtually the same as those expounded by Stephen. This is not to say that the Joyce who wrote A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Ulysses is identical with the Joyce-Stephen presented in the novels. Between the time depicted and the time of writing occurred several events, including his elopement with Nora Barnacle in October 1904, which changed the artist's outlook. Yet, if Joyce looked back on the foibles of his youth with amused detachment and described them with irony, he was ready to admit the relationship between author and hero. “Many writers have written about themselves,” he said to Frank Budgen, “I wonder if any of them has been as candid as I have.”
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Beebe, Maurice
spellingShingle Beebe, Maurice
James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
author_facet Beebe, Maurice
author_sort Beebe, Maurice
title James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
title_short James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
title_full James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
title_fullStr James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
title_full_unstemmed James Joyce: Barnacle Goose and Lapwing
title_sort james joyce: barnacle goose and lapwing
publisher Modern Language Association (MLA)
publishDate 1956
url http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/460705
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S0030812900011068
genre Barnacle goose
genre_facet Barnacle goose
op_source PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America
volume 71, issue 3, page 302-320
ISSN 0030-8129 1938-1530
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2307/460705
container_title PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America
container_volume 71
container_issue 3
container_start_page 302
op_container_end_page 320
_version_ 1801373952450232320