Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples

On the Washington and Oregon coast of the NE Pacific Ocean from 2008-2015, we found that juveniles represented 83% of Northern Fulmars that were beached. In comparison to older birds, juveniles averaged more mass and pieces of plastic in stomachs. This reflected relatively larger plastic loads in th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research
Main Authors: Shugart, Gary W., Nania, Tessa G.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: LIDSEN Publishing Inc 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2103023
id crlidsenpubl:10.21926/aeer.2103023
record_format openpolar
spelling crlidsenpubl:10.21926/aeer.2103023 2024-09-15T18:07:11+00:00 Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples Shugart, Gary W. Nania, Tessa G. 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2103023 unknown LIDSEN Publishing Inc Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research volume 02, issue 03, page 1-1 ISSN 2766-6190 journal-article 2021 crlidsenpubl https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2103023 2024-08-20T04:06:52Z On the Washington and Oregon coast of the NE Pacific Ocean from 2008-2015, we found that juveniles represented 83% of Northern Fulmars that were beached. In comparison to older birds, juveniles averaged more mass and pieces of plastic in stomachs. This reflected relatively larger plastic loads in the cranial stomach section, the proventriculus, which we found was associated with relatively large accumulations in the caudal stomach section, the ventriculus. We estimate that the proventriculus could retain almost 10 times as much plastic as the ventriculus and that retention of proventricular plastic largely accounted for the difference in juveniles versus older birds. Our findings contrast with published Atlantic Ocean reports where the proportion of immatures was lower and plastic was retained mostly in ventriculi. The differences in demography and gastric distribution between NE Pacific and Atlantic fulmars may reflect the different sizes of plastic particles that were available. The preponderance of juveniles in NE Pacific Ocean samples and associated relatively large plastic loads overestimate the load for the species. Without accounting for age and gastric distribution, comparison to other regions is ill-advised. An unrecognized complication in stomach-based sampling is that differences in size of plastic at spatiotemporal scales could affect the utility of stomach samples as bioindicators of oceanic plastic pollution. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fulmarus glacialis LIDSEN Publishing Inc Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research 02 03 1 1
institution Open Polar
collection LIDSEN Publishing Inc
op_collection_id crlidsenpubl
language unknown
description On the Washington and Oregon coast of the NE Pacific Ocean from 2008-2015, we found that juveniles represented 83% of Northern Fulmars that were beached. In comparison to older birds, juveniles averaged more mass and pieces of plastic in stomachs. This reflected relatively larger plastic loads in the cranial stomach section, the proventriculus, which we found was associated with relatively large accumulations in the caudal stomach section, the ventriculus. We estimate that the proventriculus could retain almost 10 times as much plastic as the ventriculus and that retention of proventricular plastic largely accounted for the difference in juveniles versus older birds. Our findings contrast with published Atlantic Ocean reports where the proportion of immatures was lower and plastic was retained mostly in ventriculi. The differences in demography and gastric distribution between NE Pacific and Atlantic fulmars may reflect the different sizes of plastic particles that were available. The preponderance of juveniles in NE Pacific Ocean samples and associated relatively large plastic loads overestimate the load for the species. Without accounting for age and gastric distribution, comparison to other regions is ill-advised. An unrecognized complication in stomach-based sampling is that differences in size of plastic at spatiotemporal scales could affect the utility of stomach samples as bioindicators of oceanic plastic pollution.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Shugart, Gary W.
Nania, Tessa G.
spellingShingle Shugart, Gary W.
Nania, Tessa G.
Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
author_facet Shugart, Gary W.
Nania, Tessa G.
author_sort Shugart, Gary W.
title Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
title_short Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
title_full Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
title_fullStr Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
title_full_unstemmed Demographic Differences in the Quantity, Mass, and Anatomical Location of Ingested Plastic in Northern Fulmars (Fulmarus glacialis): A Review and Reconsideration of NE Pacific Ocean Samples
title_sort demographic differences in the quantity, mass, and anatomical location of ingested plastic in northern fulmars (fulmarus glacialis): a review and reconsideration of ne pacific ocean samples
publisher LIDSEN Publishing Inc
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2103023
genre Fulmarus glacialis
genre_facet Fulmarus glacialis
op_source Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research
volume 02, issue 03, page 1-1
ISSN 2766-6190
op_doi https://doi.org/10.21926/aeer.2103023
container_title Advances in Environmental and Engineering Research
container_volume 02
container_issue 03
container_start_page 1
op_container_end_page 1
_version_ 1810444569203965952