Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order

Since 1990 Russia has experienced an unexpected “ethnic revival.” Varying widely in geography, culture, economic development, and institutional history, the country's thirty-two ethnic regions offer a chance to weigh the evidence for alternative theories of separatist activism. This paper exami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:World Politics
Main Author: Treisman, Daniel S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Project MUSE 1997
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0006
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S004388710000455X
id crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/wp.1997.0006
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/wp.1997.0006 2024-09-15T18:02:03+00:00 Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order Treisman, Daniel S. 1997 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0006 https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S004388710000455X en eng Project MUSE https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms World Politics volume 49, issue 2, page 212-249 ISSN 0043-8871 1086-3338 journal-article 1997 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0006 2024-09-05T04:56:23Z Since 1990 Russia has experienced an unexpected “ethnic revival.” Varying widely in geography, culture, economic development, and institutional history, the country's thirty-two ethnic regions offer a chance to weigh the evidence for alternative theories of separatist activism. This paper examines statistically why some—such as Chechnya and Tatarstan—have come to epitomize demands for greater independence, while others—such as Mordovia or Chukotka—have remained largely quiescent. It finds that, while a Muslim religious tradition predisposed a region's leaders to press greater separatist demands, such primordial factors werefilteredthrough a rational calculus of the region's relative bargaining power in negotiations with the center and of the leader's own organizational interests. Contrary to some leading theories, the most developed, resource-rich, and high-income groups and regions were more separatist than more economically backward ones. Article in Journal/Newspaper Chukotka Johns Hopkins University Press World Politics 49 2 212 249
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University Press
op_collection_id crjohnshopkinsun
language English
description Since 1990 Russia has experienced an unexpected “ethnic revival.” Varying widely in geography, culture, economic development, and institutional history, the country's thirty-two ethnic regions offer a chance to weigh the evidence for alternative theories of separatist activism. This paper examines statistically why some—such as Chechnya and Tatarstan—have come to epitomize demands for greater independence, while others—such as Mordovia or Chukotka—have remained largely quiescent. It finds that, while a Muslim religious tradition predisposed a region's leaders to press greater separatist demands, such primordial factors werefilteredthrough a rational calculus of the region's relative bargaining power in negotiations with the center and of the leader's own organizational interests. Contrary to some leading theories, the most developed, resource-rich, and high-income groups and regions were more separatist than more economically backward ones.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Treisman, Daniel S.
spellingShingle Treisman, Daniel S.
Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
author_facet Treisman, Daniel S.
author_sort Treisman, Daniel S.
title Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
title_short Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
title_full Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
title_fullStr Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
title_full_unstemmed Russia's “Ethnic Revival”: The Separatist Activism of Regional Leaders in a Postcommunist Order
title_sort russia's “ethnic revival”: the separatist activism of regional leaders in a postcommunist order
publisher Project MUSE
publishDate 1997
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0006
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/S004388710000455X
genre Chukotka
genre_facet Chukotka
op_source World Politics
volume 49, issue 2, page 212-249
ISSN 0043-8871 1086-3338
op_rights https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0006
container_title World Politics
container_volume 49
container_issue 2
container_start_page 212
op_container_end_page 249
_version_ 1810439138023833600