Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики

SUMMARY: Imperial Russia never witnessed any specific positive interest to the formation of “alien” nations and the Karel national movement was no exception. Furthermore, attempts by a part of the White Sea Karels and Finns to incorporate Karels as a component of the developing Finnish nation trigge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ab Imperio
Main Author: Кауппала, Пекка
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Project MUSE 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0085
id crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/imp.2002.0085
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/imp.2002.0085 2024-05-19T07:43:20+00:00 Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики Кауппала, Пекка 2002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0085 en eng Project MUSE Ab Imperio volume 2002, issue 2, page 309-337 ISSN 2164-9731 journal-article 2002 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0085 2024-04-25T07:54:38Z SUMMARY: Imperial Russia never witnessed any specific positive interest to the formation of “alien” nations and the Karel national movement was no exception. Furthermore, attempts by a part of the White Sea Karels and Finns to incorporate Karels as a component of the developing Finnish nation triggered particular animosity. At the beginning of the 20 th century the authorities promoted an ethnocultural myth according to which Karels were closer to Russians than Finns and, correspondingly, ought to become part of the Russian nation. In comparison to these developments the conception of Soviet nationalities policy in Karelia, formed in 1920, was indeed revolutionary. The model selected then would have encountered most vicious counteraction in Imperial Russia. The leadership of Soviet Karelia, with Lenin’s full support and at least in the early 1920s with the support of the Soviet leadership as a whole, viewed Karels as a part of the Finnish nation, and it was only the political border between the Reds and the Whites that separated the two. The nationalities policy in Karelia was oriented towards this model and it was most successful exactly where it most corresponded to reality, namely in White Sea Karelia. Here the Russian language was replaced with the classical literary Finnish in all spheres of public life without any adaptation of the latter. In those regions where the conditions were more complicated, namely in Southern Karelia, the replacement of Russian with Finnish went on slower, albeit intensively enough. In this sense, the processes that took place in Karelia in the 1920s–1930s can hardly be termed as formation of the Karelian nation. But the Soviet empire in this period can easily be called the creator of the united Great Finnish nation, although in practice this nation was divided into two parts by the border. The leadership of the Soviet Union and, in equal degree, that of Finland, showed no interest in this border becoming transparent. In both countries the real policy was aimed at the continued ... Article in Journal/Newspaper karelia* karelia* karelian White Sea Johns Hopkins University Press Ab Imperio 2002 2 309 337
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University Press
op_collection_id crjohnshopkinsun
language English
description SUMMARY: Imperial Russia never witnessed any specific positive interest to the formation of “alien” nations and the Karel national movement was no exception. Furthermore, attempts by a part of the White Sea Karels and Finns to incorporate Karels as a component of the developing Finnish nation triggered particular animosity. At the beginning of the 20 th century the authorities promoted an ethnocultural myth according to which Karels were closer to Russians than Finns and, correspondingly, ought to become part of the Russian nation. In comparison to these developments the conception of Soviet nationalities policy in Karelia, formed in 1920, was indeed revolutionary. The model selected then would have encountered most vicious counteraction in Imperial Russia. The leadership of Soviet Karelia, with Lenin’s full support and at least in the early 1920s with the support of the Soviet leadership as a whole, viewed Karels as a part of the Finnish nation, and it was only the political border between the Reds and the Whites that separated the two. The nationalities policy in Karelia was oriented towards this model and it was most successful exactly where it most corresponded to reality, namely in White Sea Karelia. Here the Russian language was replaced with the classical literary Finnish in all spheres of public life without any adaptation of the latter. In those regions where the conditions were more complicated, namely in Southern Karelia, the replacement of Russian with Finnish went on slower, albeit intensively enough. In this sense, the processes that took place in Karelia in the 1920s–1930s can hardly be termed as formation of the Karelian nation. But the Soviet empire in this period can easily be called the creator of the united Great Finnish nation, although in practice this nation was divided into two parts by the border. The leadership of the Soviet Union and, in equal degree, that of Finland, showed no interest in this border becoming transparent. In both countries the real policy was aimed at the continued ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Кауппала, Пекка
spellingShingle Кауппала, Пекка
Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
author_facet Кауппала, Пекка
author_sort Кауппала, Пекка
title Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
title_short Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
title_full Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
title_fullStr Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
title_full_unstemmed Формирование и расцвет автономной Советской Карелии, 1918–1929 гг. Забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
title_sort формирование и расцвет автономной советской карелии, 1918–1929 гг. забытый успех раннесоветской национальной политики
publisher Project MUSE
publishDate 2002
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0085
genre karelia*
karelia*
karelian
White Sea
genre_facet karelia*
karelia*
karelian
White Sea
op_source Ab Imperio
volume 2002, issue 2, page 309-337
ISSN 2164-9731
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/imp.2002.0085
container_title Ab Imperio
container_volume 2002
container_issue 2
container_start_page 309
op_container_end_page 337
_version_ 1799483066187513856