The Climate Hackers

Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dissent
Main Author: Riederer, Rachel
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Project MUSE 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064
id crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/dss.2015.0064
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/dss.2015.0064 2024-03-03T08:48:44+00:00 The Climate Hackers Riederer, Rachel 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 en eng Project MUSE Dissent volume 62, issue 3, page 18-22 ISSN 1946-0910 General Medicine journal-article 2015 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 2024-02-03T23:20:37Z Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to say the least, but, as a new report shows, geoengineering is edging away from the margins and toward the center of discussions about climate change. The polarized debate surrounding geoengineering exemplifies the difficulties of talking about, much less solving, the problem of climate change, an issue where ethical, scientific, and political questions overlap, blend together, and sometimes obscure one another. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Johns Hopkins University Press Dissent 62 3 18 22
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University Press
op_collection_id crjohnshopkinsun
language English
topic General Medicine
spellingShingle General Medicine
Riederer, Rachel
The Climate Hackers
topic_facet General Medicine
description Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to say the least, but, as a new report shows, geoengineering is edging away from the margins and toward the center of discussions about climate change. The polarized debate surrounding geoengineering exemplifies the difficulties of talking about, much less solving, the problem of climate change, an issue where ethical, scientific, and political questions overlap, blend together, and sometimes obscure one another.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Riederer, Rachel
author_facet Riederer, Rachel
author_sort Riederer, Rachel
title The Climate Hackers
title_short The Climate Hackers
title_full The Climate Hackers
title_fullStr The Climate Hackers
title_full_unstemmed The Climate Hackers
title_sort climate hackers
publisher Project MUSE
publishDate 2015
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source Dissent
volume 62, issue 3, page 18-22
ISSN 1946-0910
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064
container_title Dissent
container_volume 62
container_issue 3
container_start_page 18
op_container_end_page 22
_version_ 1792505742352187392