The Climate Hackers
Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to s...
Published in: | Dissent |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Project MUSE
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 |
id |
crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/dss.2015.0064 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/dss.2015.0064 2024-03-03T08:48:44+00:00 The Climate Hackers Riederer, Rachel 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 en eng Project MUSE Dissent volume 62, issue 3, page 18-22 ISSN 1946-0910 General Medicine journal-article 2015 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 2024-02-03T23:20:37Z Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to say the least, but, as a new report shows, geoengineering is edging away from the margins and toward the center of discussions about climate change. The polarized debate surrounding geoengineering exemplifies the difficulties of talking about, much less solving, the problem of climate change, an issue where ethical, scientific, and political questions overlap, blend together, and sometimes obscure one another. Article in Journal/Newspaper Sea ice Johns Hopkins University Press Dissent 62 3 18 22 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Johns Hopkins University Press |
op_collection_id |
crjohnshopkinsun |
language |
English |
topic |
General Medicine |
spellingShingle |
General Medicine Riederer, Rachel The Climate Hackers |
topic_facet |
General Medicine |
description |
Different forms of geoengineering have been proposed: spraying sulfates into the upper atmosphere to block a portion of sunlight, fertilizing the ocean with iron to spark carbon-gobbling algal blooms, or covering sea ice with bags of silicon beads to slow its melting. The idea is controversial, to say the least, but, as a new report shows, geoengineering is edging away from the margins and toward the center of discussions about climate change. The polarized debate surrounding geoengineering exemplifies the difficulties of talking about, much less solving, the problem of climate change, an issue where ethical, scientific, and political questions overlap, blend together, and sometimes obscure one another. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Riederer, Rachel |
author_facet |
Riederer, Rachel |
author_sort |
Riederer, Rachel |
title |
The Climate Hackers |
title_short |
The Climate Hackers |
title_full |
The Climate Hackers |
title_fullStr |
The Climate Hackers |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Climate Hackers |
title_sort |
climate hackers |
publisher |
Project MUSE |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 |
genre |
Sea ice |
genre_facet |
Sea ice |
op_source |
Dissent volume 62, issue 3, page 18-22 ISSN 1946-0910 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2015.0064 |
container_title |
Dissent |
container_volume |
62 |
container_issue |
3 |
container_start_page |
18 |
op_container_end_page |
22 |
_version_ |
1792505742352187392 |