A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers

Two major oil-producing regions frame this article. The first is the onshore oil world in the global South (the Niger delta in Nigeria as part of the wider Gulf of Guinea), and the second is the offshore world of deepwater oil and gas exploration and production in the United States (specifically, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Quarterly
Main Author: Watts, Michael
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Project MUSE 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0039
id crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/aq.2012.0039
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/aq.2012.0039 2024-10-13T14:05:37+00:00 A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers Watts, Michael 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0039 en eng Project MUSE American Quarterly volume 64, issue 3, page 437-467 ISSN 1080-6490 journal-article 2012 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0039 2024-09-19T04:13:44Z Two major oil-producing regions frame this article. The first is the onshore oil world in the global South (the Niger delta in Nigeria as part of the wider Gulf of Guinea), and the second is the offshore world of deepwater oil and gas exploration and production in the United States (specifically, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Deepwater Horizon blowout). Both arenas can be seen as oil frontiers—frontiers of accumulation and dispossession—rooted in the operations of specific oil assemblages. I trace the relations between the deep infrastructures of the oil world—pipelines, rigs, flowstations, tankers, financiers, engineering firms, security forces, and so on—and to the regimes of life and death in the postcolonial South and the advanced capitalist North. Political, economic, and social relations are, as Timothy Mitchell notes, engineered out of the flows of energy. Opening up these sorts of oil frontiers—whether in Angolan or Brazilian deepwater, Russian Siberia, or increasingly now the frozen frontiers of the Arctic—necessitates engagements with place-specific social and political forces, none of which necessarily or easily are compatible with some presumed set of desires of corporate oil capital—political stability, surplus management, price control—or indeed of imperialist oil-consuming states. In one case the terminal point is an insurgency and combustible politics threatening the very operations of the oil industry and the petrostate itself; in the other it is the violence of a blowout—the loss of human and environmental life and livelihoods—and of the deadly consequences of substituting technical and financial over political risks. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Siberia Johns Hopkins University Press Arctic American Quarterly 64 3 437 467
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University Press
op_collection_id crjohnshopkinsun
language English
description Two major oil-producing regions frame this article. The first is the onshore oil world in the global South (the Niger delta in Nigeria as part of the wider Gulf of Guinea), and the second is the offshore world of deepwater oil and gas exploration and production in the United States (specifically, the Gulf of Mexico, and the Deepwater Horizon blowout). Both arenas can be seen as oil frontiers—frontiers of accumulation and dispossession—rooted in the operations of specific oil assemblages. I trace the relations between the deep infrastructures of the oil world—pipelines, rigs, flowstations, tankers, financiers, engineering firms, security forces, and so on—and to the regimes of life and death in the postcolonial South and the advanced capitalist North. Political, economic, and social relations are, as Timothy Mitchell notes, engineered out of the flows of energy. Opening up these sorts of oil frontiers—whether in Angolan or Brazilian deepwater, Russian Siberia, or increasingly now the frozen frontiers of the Arctic—necessitates engagements with place-specific social and political forces, none of which necessarily or easily are compatible with some presumed set of desires of corporate oil capital—political stability, surplus management, price control—or indeed of imperialist oil-consuming states. In one case the terminal point is an insurgency and combustible politics threatening the very operations of the oil industry and the petrostate itself; in the other it is the violence of a blowout—the loss of human and environmental life and livelihoods—and of the deadly consequences of substituting technical and financial over political risks.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Watts, Michael
spellingShingle Watts, Michael
A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
author_facet Watts, Michael
author_sort Watts, Michael
title A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
title_short A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
title_full A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
title_fullStr A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
title_full_unstemmed A Tale of Two Gulfs: Life, Death, and Dispossession along Two Oil Frontiers
title_sort tale of two gulfs: life, death, and dispossession along two oil frontiers
publisher Project MUSE
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0039
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Siberia
genre_facet Arctic
Siberia
op_source American Quarterly
volume 64, issue 3, page 437-467
ISSN 1080-6490
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2012.0039
container_title American Quarterly
container_volume 64
container_issue 3
container_start_page 437
op_container_end_page 467
_version_ 1812811688778399744