Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)

"Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)" puts ethnography and cinematic representations of Native Americans in crucial dialogue with the work of contemporary indigenous filmmakers. The author explores what it m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:American Quarterly
Main Author: Raheja, Michelle
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Project MUSE 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2007.0083
id crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/aq.2007.0083
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnshopkinsun:10.1353/aq.2007.0083 2024-06-23T07:50:12+00:00 Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner) Raheja, Michelle 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2007.0083 en eng Project MUSE American Quarterly volume 59, issue 4, page 1159-1185 ISSN 1080-6490 journal-article 2007 crjohnshopkinsun https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2007.0083 2024-06-13T04:15:46Z "Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)" puts ethnography and cinematic representations of Native Americans in crucial dialogue with the work of contemporary indigenous filmmakers. The author explores what it means for indigenous people "to laugh at the camera" as a tactic of what she calls "visual sovereignty," to confront the spectator with the often absurd assumptions that circulate around visual representations of Native Americans, while also flagging their involvement and, to some degree, complicity in these often disempowering structures of cinematic dominance and stereotype. She employs Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner) (2000), the first full-length feature film directed by an Inuit, Zacharias Kunuk, and produced by Igloolik Isuma Productions, Inc., a collaborative, majority Inuit production company, as her primary context for analysis to examine the ways this film is embedded within discourses about Arctic peoples that cannot be severed from the larger web of hegemonic discourses of ethnography. She does this first by discussing the pervasive images of Native Americans in ethnographic films and then by theorizing the ways that Atanarjuat intervenes into visual sovereignty as a film that successfully addresses a dual Inuit and non-Inuit audience for two different aims. More specifically, she interrogates how the Atanarjuat filmmakers strategically adjust and reframe the registers on which Inuit epistemes are considered with the twin, but not necessarily conflicting, aims of operating in the service of their home communities and forcing viewers to reconsider mass-mediated images of the Arctic. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Igloolik inuit Johns Hopkins University Press Arctic Igloolik ENVELOPE(-81.800,-81.800,69.378,69.378) American Quarterly 59 4 1159 1185
institution Open Polar
collection Johns Hopkins University Press
op_collection_id crjohnshopkinsun
language English
description "Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)" puts ethnography and cinematic representations of Native Americans in crucial dialogue with the work of contemporary indigenous filmmakers. The author explores what it means for indigenous people "to laugh at the camera" as a tactic of what she calls "visual sovereignty," to confront the spectator with the often absurd assumptions that circulate around visual representations of Native Americans, while also flagging their involvement and, to some degree, complicity in these often disempowering structures of cinematic dominance and stereotype. She employs Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner) (2000), the first full-length feature film directed by an Inuit, Zacharias Kunuk, and produced by Igloolik Isuma Productions, Inc., a collaborative, majority Inuit production company, as her primary context for analysis to examine the ways this film is embedded within discourses about Arctic peoples that cannot be severed from the larger web of hegemonic discourses of ethnography. She does this first by discussing the pervasive images of Native Americans in ethnographic films and then by theorizing the ways that Atanarjuat intervenes into visual sovereignty as a film that successfully addresses a dual Inuit and non-Inuit audience for two different aims. More specifically, she interrogates how the Atanarjuat filmmakers strategically adjust and reframe the registers on which Inuit epistemes are considered with the twin, but not necessarily conflicting, aims of operating in the service of their home communities and forcing viewers to reconsider mass-mediated images of the Arctic.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Raheja, Michelle
spellingShingle Raheja, Michelle
Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
author_facet Raheja, Michelle
author_sort Raheja, Michelle
title Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
title_short Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
title_full Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
title_fullStr Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
title_full_unstemmed Reading Nanook's Smile: Visual Sovereignty, Indigenous Revisions of Ethnography, and Atanarjuat (The Fast Runner)
title_sort reading nanook's smile: visual sovereignty, indigenous revisions of ethnography, and atanarjuat (the fast runner)
publisher Project MUSE
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aq.2007.0083
long_lat ENVELOPE(-81.800,-81.800,69.378,69.378)
geographic Arctic
Igloolik
geographic_facet Arctic
Igloolik
genre Arctic
Igloolik
inuit
genre_facet Arctic
Igloolik
inuit
op_source American Quarterly
volume 59, issue 4, page 1159-1185
ISSN 1080-6490
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2007.0083
container_title American Quarterly
container_volume 59
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1159
op_container_end_page 1185
_version_ 1802641066473553920