Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut

While it is clear that some languages have a grammatical mass/count distinction (e.g. English), in other languages (e.g. Inuktitut) it is not so obvious. In this paper, I show that Inuttut (Labrador Inuktitut) has a subtle grammatical mass/count distinction: while number, numerals, and most quantifi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Linguistic Variation
Main Author: Gillon, Carrie
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: John Benjamins Publishing Company 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
http://www.jbe-platform.com/deliver/fulltext/lv.12.2.03gil.pdf
id crjohnbenjaminsp:10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
record_format openpolar
spelling crjohnbenjaminsp:10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil 2024-06-09T07:47:20+00:00 Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut Gillon, Carrie 2012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil http://www.jbe-platform.com/deliver/fulltext/lv.12.2.03gil.pdf en eng John Benjamins Publishing Company Linguistic Variation volume 12, issue 2, page 211-246 ISSN 2211-6834 2211-6842 journal-article 2012 crjohnbenjaminsp https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil 2024-05-15T13:26:39Z While it is clear that some languages have a grammatical mass/count distinction (e.g. English), in other languages (e.g. Inuktitut) it is not so obvious. In this paper, I show that Inuttut (Labrador Inuktitut) has a subtle grammatical mass/count distinction: while number, numerals, and most quantifiers do not disambiguate between mass and count nouns, in a few places, the morphology or the semantics disambiguates between mass and count. Thus, Inuttut is not a counterexample to Doetjes (1997) or Chierchia (2010), who both argue that all languages distinguish between mass and count. I further argue against Borer (2005) who claims all nouns in all languages are underlyingly neutral, and are assigned mass interpretation by default in the absence of individuation. I show that Inuttut nouns cannot all be underlyingly neutral and/or mass by default. Keywords: mass; count; classifiers; Inuktitut; number; numerals; quantifiers Article in Journal/Newspaper inuktitut Inuttut John Benjamins Publishing Company Linguistic Variation 12 2 211 246
institution Open Polar
collection John Benjamins Publishing Company
op_collection_id crjohnbenjaminsp
language English
description While it is clear that some languages have a grammatical mass/count distinction (e.g. English), in other languages (e.g. Inuktitut) it is not so obvious. In this paper, I show that Inuttut (Labrador Inuktitut) has a subtle grammatical mass/count distinction: while number, numerals, and most quantifiers do not disambiguate between mass and count nouns, in a few places, the morphology or the semantics disambiguates between mass and count. Thus, Inuttut is not a counterexample to Doetjes (1997) or Chierchia (2010), who both argue that all languages distinguish between mass and count. I further argue against Borer (2005) who claims all nouns in all languages are underlyingly neutral, and are assigned mass interpretation by default in the absence of individuation. I show that Inuttut nouns cannot all be underlyingly neutral and/or mass by default. Keywords: mass; count; classifiers; Inuktitut; number; numerals; quantifiers
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gillon, Carrie
spellingShingle Gillon, Carrie
Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
author_facet Gillon, Carrie
author_sort Gillon, Carrie
title Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
title_short Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
title_full Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
title_fullStr Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for mass and count in Inuttut
title_sort evidence for mass and count in inuttut
publisher John Benjamins Publishing Company
publishDate 2012
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
http://www.jbe-platform.com/deliver/fulltext/lv.12.2.03gil.pdf
genre inuktitut
Inuttut
genre_facet inuktitut
Inuttut
op_source Linguistic Variation
volume 12, issue 2, page 211-246
ISSN 2211-6834 2211-6842
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1075/lv.12.2.03gil
container_title Linguistic Variation
container_volume 12
container_issue 2
container_start_page 211
op_container_end_page 246
_version_ 1801378321636786176