Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study

Objective To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Disease-modifying a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:RMD Open
Main Authors: Holten, Karen, Sexton, Joseph, Kvien, Tore K, Aga, Anna-Birgitte, Haavardsholm, Espen A
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMJ 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
id crjcrbmj:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
record_format openpolar
spelling crjcrbmj:10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 2024-06-23T07:50:13+00:00 Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study Holten, Karen Sexton, Joseph Kvien, Tore K Aga, Anna-Birgitte Haavardsholm, Espen A 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 en eng BMJ RMD Open volume 4, issue 2, page e000754 ISSN 2056-5933 journal-article 2018 crjcrbmj https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 2024-05-30T08:18:50Z Objective To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with RA with short disease duration were included in the treat-to-target ARCTIC trial and followed for 24 months. The responsiveness of the RAID score was evaluated using standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) with respect to tender joints by Ritchie Articular Index (RAI). SRMs and REs were also calculated for other PROMs, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome measures. An SRM with value above 0.80 was considered high. Results 230 patients with RA were included. The mean±SD symptom duration was 7.1±5.4 months and the baseline mean±SD RAID score was 4.49±2.14. At 3 months of follow-up, the mean±SD change score for RAID was −2.25±1.98 and the SRM (95% CI) −1.13 (−1.33 to −0.96). The RAID score showed high responsiveness both at 3 and 6 months (SRM≥0.80) and was more sensitive in detecting change than the reference, tender joints assessed by RAI. Conclusions The RAID score proved to be highly responsive to change in patients with RA with short disease duration who followed a treat-to-target strategy. The RAID score was more efficient in detecting change than the reference (RAI) as well as most other PROMs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic The BMJ Arctic Ritchie ENVELOPE(-128.387,-128.387,54.916,54.916) RMD Open 4 2 e000754
institution Open Polar
collection The BMJ
op_collection_id crjcrbmj
language English
description Objective To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with RA with short disease duration were included in the treat-to-target ARCTIC trial and followed for 24 months. The responsiveness of the RAID score was evaluated using standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) with respect to tender joints by Ritchie Articular Index (RAI). SRMs and REs were also calculated for other PROMs, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome measures. An SRM with value above 0.80 was considered high. Results 230 patients with RA were included. The mean±SD symptom duration was 7.1±5.4 months and the baseline mean±SD RAID score was 4.49±2.14. At 3 months of follow-up, the mean±SD change score for RAID was −2.25±1.98 and the SRM (95% CI) −1.13 (−1.33 to −0.96). The RAID score showed high responsiveness both at 3 and 6 months (SRM≥0.80) and was more sensitive in detecting change than the reference, tender joints assessed by RAI. Conclusions The RAID score proved to be highly responsive to change in patients with RA with short disease duration who followed a treat-to-target strategy. The RAID score was more efficient in detecting change than the reference (RAI) as well as most other PROMs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore K
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A
spellingShingle Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore K
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A
Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
author_facet Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore K
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A
author_sort Holten, Karen
title Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_short Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_full Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_fullStr Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_sort comparative analyses of responsiveness between the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the arctic study
publisher BMJ
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
long_lat ENVELOPE(-128.387,-128.387,54.916,54.916)
geographic Arctic
Ritchie
geographic_facet Arctic
Ritchie
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source RMD Open
volume 4, issue 2, page e000754
ISSN 2056-5933
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
container_title RMD Open
container_volume 4
container_issue 2
container_start_page e000754
_version_ 1802641091141304320