Novel approach to artefact detection and the definition of normal ranges of segmental strain and strain-rate values

• Published in: Open Heart
• Main Authors: Kornev, Mikhail, Caglayan, Hatice Akay, Kudryavtsev, Alexander, Malyutina, Sofia, Ryabikov, Andrew, Stylidis, Michael, Schirmer, Henrik, Rösner, Assami
• Other Authors: Helse Nord RHF, Russian Academy of Science
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: BMJ 2022
• Subjects: Norway; Tromsø
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002136; https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/openhrt-2022-002136

Aims Strain artefacts are known to hamper the correct interpretation of segmental strain and strain-rate (S/SR). Defining the normal ranges of myocardial segmental deformation is important in clinical studies and routine echocardiographic practice. In order to define artefact-free normal ranges for segmental longitudinal S/SR parameters, we investigated the extent to which different types of artefacts and their segmental localisation in the three different myocardial layers created a bias in the results of echocardiographic strain measurements. Methods The study included echocardiograms from men and women aged 40–69 years from two population-based studies, namely the Know Your Heart study (Russia) and the Tromsø Study (Norway). Of the 2207 individuals from these studies, 840 had normal results, defined as the absence of hypertension or indicators of any cardiovascular disease. Two-dimensional (2D) global and segmental S/SR of the three myocardial layers were analysed using speckle tracking echocardiography. Artefacts were assessed with two different methods: visual identification of image-artefacts and a novel conceptual approach of ‘curve-artefacts’ or unphysiological strain-curve formation. Results Segmental strain values were found to have significantly reduced in the presence of strain-curve artefacts (14.9%±5.8% towards −20.7%±4.9%), and increased with the foreshortening of the 2D image. However, the individual global strain values were not substantially altered by discarding segmental artefacts. Reduction due to artefacts was observed in all segments, layers, systolic and diastolic strain, and SR. Thus, we presented normal ranges for basal-septal, basal, medial and apical segment groups after excluding artefacts. Conclusion Strain-curve artefacts introduce systematic errors, resulting in reduced segmental S/SR values. In terms of artefact-robust global longitudinal strain, the detection of curve-artefacts is crucial for the correct interpretation of segmental S/SR patterns. Intersegmental S/SR gradients ...