Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial

Introduction Electrocautery is used widely in surgical procedures, but making skin incision has routinely been performed with scalpel rather than electrocautery, for fear that electrocautery may cause poor incision healing, excessive scarring and increased wound complication rates. More and more stu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMJ Open
Main Authors: Xu, Wei, Fang, Mei, Wang, Zexu, Wang, Jiayan, Tao, Chuanyuan, Ma, Lu, Li, Li, Hu, Xin
Other Authors: West China Hospital, Sichuan University
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMJ 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
id crjcrbmj:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
record_format openpolar
spelling crjcrbmj:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444 2023-12-24T10:24:41+01:00 Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial Xu, Wei Fang, Mei Wang, Zexu Wang, Jiayan Tao, Chuanyuan Ma, Lu Li, Li Hu, Xin West China Hospital, Sichuan University 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444 https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444 en eng BMJ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ BMJ Open volume 13, issue 11, page e073444 ISSN 2044-6055 2044-6055 General Medicine journal-article 2023 crjcrbmj https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444 2023-11-28T21:05:33Z Introduction Electrocautery is used widely in surgical procedures, but making skin incision has routinely been performed with scalpel rather than electrocautery, for fear that electrocautery may cause poor incision healing, excessive scarring and increased wound complication rates. More and more studies on general surgery support the use of electrocautery for skin incision, but research comparing the two modalities for scalp incision in neurosurgery remains inadequate. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of needle-tip monopolar for scalp incision in supratentorial neurosurgery compared with steel scalpel. Methods and analysis In this prospective, randomised, double-blind trial, 120 eligible patients who are planned to undergo supratentorial neurosurgery will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In controlled group scalp incision will be made with a scalpel from the epidermis to the galea aponeurotica, while in intervention group scalp will be first incised with a steel scalpel from the epidermis to the dermis, and then the subcutaneous tissue and galea aponeurotica will be incised with needle-tip monopolar on cutting mode. The primary outcomes are scar score (at 90 days). The secondary outcomes include incision pain (at 1 day, on discharge, at 90 days) and alopecia around the incision (at 90 days), incision blood loss and incision-related operation time (during operation), incision infection and incision healing (on discharge, at 2 weeks, 90 days). Ethics and dissemination This trial will be performed according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. This study has been validated by the ethics committee of West China Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained from each included patient and/or their designated representative. Final results from this trial will be promulgated through publications. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200063243. Article in Journal/Newspaper SCAR The BMJ (via Crossref) BMJ Open 13 11 e073444
institution Open Polar
collection The BMJ (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crjcrbmj
language English
topic General Medicine
spellingShingle General Medicine
Xu, Wei
Fang, Mei
Wang, Zexu
Wang, Jiayan
Tao, Chuanyuan
Ma, Lu
Li, Li
Hu, Xin
Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
topic_facet General Medicine
description Introduction Electrocautery is used widely in surgical procedures, but making skin incision has routinely been performed with scalpel rather than electrocautery, for fear that electrocautery may cause poor incision healing, excessive scarring and increased wound complication rates. More and more studies on general surgery support the use of electrocautery for skin incision, but research comparing the two modalities for scalp incision in neurosurgery remains inadequate. This trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of needle-tip monopolar for scalp incision in supratentorial neurosurgery compared with steel scalpel. Methods and analysis In this prospective, randomised, double-blind trial, 120 eligible patients who are planned to undergo supratentorial neurosurgery will be enrolled. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups. In controlled group scalp incision will be made with a scalpel from the epidermis to the galea aponeurotica, while in intervention group scalp will be first incised with a steel scalpel from the epidermis to the dermis, and then the subcutaneous tissue and galea aponeurotica will be incised with needle-tip monopolar on cutting mode. The primary outcomes are scar score (at 90 days). The secondary outcomes include incision pain (at 1 day, on discharge, at 90 days) and alopecia around the incision (at 90 days), incision blood loss and incision-related operation time (during operation), incision infection and incision healing (on discharge, at 2 weeks, 90 days). Ethics and dissemination This trial will be performed according to the principles of Declaration of Helsinki and good clinical practice guidelines. This study has been validated by the ethics committee of West China Hospital. Informed consent will be obtained from each included patient and/or their designated representative. Final results from this trial will be promulgated through publications. Trial registration number ChiCTR2200063243.
author2 West China Hospital, Sichuan University
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Xu, Wei
Fang, Mei
Wang, Zexu
Wang, Jiayan
Tao, Chuanyuan
Ma, Lu
Li, Li
Hu, Xin
author_facet Xu, Wei
Fang, Mei
Wang, Zexu
Wang, Jiayan
Tao, Chuanyuan
Ma, Lu
Li, Li
Hu, Xin
author_sort Xu, Wei
title Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
title_short Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
title_full Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
title_fullStr Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
title_full_unstemmed Needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
title_sort needle-tip electrocautery versus steel scalpel incision in neurosurgery: study protocol for a prospective single-centre randomised controlled double-blind trial
publisher BMJ
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
https://syndication.highwire.org/content/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
genre SCAR
genre_facet SCAR
op_source BMJ Open
volume 13, issue 11, page e073444
ISSN 2044-6055 2044-6055
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073444
container_title BMJ Open
container_volume 13
container_issue 11
container_start_page e073444
_version_ 1786199747880550400