Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting

Abstract One of the design principles for future sustainable towns is compactness. The densification of cities is very much needed, but it usually compromises the access of daylight. Densification is especially challenging in the Nordic region characterized by low angled sunlight, something that als...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
Main Authors: Sundborg, Bengt, Matusiak, Barbara Szybinska, Arbab, Shabnam
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: IOP Publishing 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016/pdf
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
id crioppubl:10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
record_format openpolar
spelling crioppubl:10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016 2024-06-02T08:09:39+00:00 Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting Sundborg, Bengt Matusiak, Barbara Szybinska Arbab, Shabnam 2019 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016/pdf https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016 unknown IOP Publishing http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ https://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science volume 352, issue 1, page 012016 ISSN 1755-1307 1755-1315 journal-article 2019 crioppubl https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016 2024-05-07T13:59:44Z Abstract One of the design principles for future sustainable towns is compactness. The densification of cities is very much needed, but it usually compromises the access of daylight. Densification is especially challenging in the Nordic region characterized by low angled sunlight, something that also limits daylight distribution and restricts its intensity. The higher the latitude, the greater is the difficulty in the distribution. Perimeter blocks give shelter from wind and often create semi-public courtyards which have been seen to be attractive in many Nordic settlements during history. In the present study, alternative design to the conventional perimeter blocks are explored and geometric options such as chamfered corners, strategically varied building heights and differently positioned openings in a broken perimeter block are analyzed. The yearly simulations as well as simulations for May 1 st have been carried out for the same perimeter blocks located at four different latitudes (decimal coordinates): 1. 65.0 Oulu (similar to Mo i Rana 66.3, Jokkmokk 66.6 and Rovaniemi 66.5) 2. 63.4 Trondheim (similar to Reykjavik 64.1, Östersund 63.2 and Vaasa 63.1) 3. 59.3 Stockholm (similar to Oslo 59.9, Helsinki 60,2, Tallinn 59.4, Saint Petersburg 59.9 and Anchorage 61.2) 4. 55.7 Copenhagen (similar to Malmö 55.6, Glasgow 55.9 and Moscow 55.8) The choice of evaluation criteria is based on scientific discourse in the field of daylighting. According to the new European standard, solar radiation is included. Computer-based daylighting simulations are performed for different designs of the perimeter blocks with equal density, FAR = 1.33. The further north a city is located, the lower the houses in a perimeter block must be to maintain a certain level of daylight. The study confirms that latitude affects daylighting and that geometrical change can improve the conditions for daylight in the perimeter blocks. Article in Journal/Newspaper Jokkmokk Mo i Rana IOP Publishing Anchorage Jokkmokk ENVELOPE(20.150,20.150,66.500,66.500) Mo i Rana ENVELOPE(14.133,14.133,66.310,66.310) Rovaniemi ENVELOPE(26.159,26.159,66.392,66.392) IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 352 1 012016
institution Open Polar
collection IOP Publishing
op_collection_id crioppubl
language unknown
description Abstract One of the design principles for future sustainable towns is compactness. The densification of cities is very much needed, but it usually compromises the access of daylight. Densification is especially challenging in the Nordic region characterized by low angled sunlight, something that also limits daylight distribution and restricts its intensity. The higher the latitude, the greater is the difficulty in the distribution. Perimeter blocks give shelter from wind and often create semi-public courtyards which have been seen to be attractive in many Nordic settlements during history. In the present study, alternative design to the conventional perimeter blocks are explored and geometric options such as chamfered corners, strategically varied building heights and differently positioned openings in a broken perimeter block are analyzed. The yearly simulations as well as simulations for May 1 st have been carried out for the same perimeter blocks located at four different latitudes (decimal coordinates): 1. 65.0 Oulu (similar to Mo i Rana 66.3, Jokkmokk 66.6 and Rovaniemi 66.5) 2. 63.4 Trondheim (similar to Reykjavik 64.1, Östersund 63.2 and Vaasa 63.1) 3. 59.3 Stockholm (similar to Oslo 59.9, Helsinki 60,2, Tallinn 59.4, Saint Petersburg 59.9 and Anchorage 61.2) 4. 55.7 Copenhagen (similar to Malmö 55.6, Glasgow 55.9 and Moscow 55.8) The choice of evaluation criteria is based on scientific discourse in the field of daylighting. According to the new European standard, solar radiation is included. Computer-based daylighting simulations are performed for different designs of the perimeter blocks with equal density, FAR = 1.33. The further north a city is located, the lower the houses in a perimeter block must be to maintain a certain level of daylight. The study confirms that latitude affects daylighting and that geometrical change can improve the conditions for daylight in the perimeter blocks.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sundborg, Bengt
Matusiak, Barbara Szybinska
Arbab, Shabnam
spellingShingle Sundborg, Bengt
Matusiak, Barbara Szybinska
Arbab, Shabnam
Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
author_facet Sundborg, Bengt
Matusiak, Barbara Szybinska
Arbab, Shabnam
author_sort Sundborg, Bengt
title Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
title_short Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
title_full Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
title_fullStr Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
title_full_unstemmed Perimeter Blocks in Nordic Towns - How latitude affect daylighting
title_sort perimeter blocks in nordic towns - how latitude affect daylighting
publisher IOP Publishing
publishDate 2019
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016/pdf
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
long_lat ENVELOPE(20.150,20.150,66.500,66.500)
ENVELOPE(14.133,14.133,66.310,66.310)
ENVELOPE(26.159,26.159,66.392,66.392)
geographic Anchorage
Jokkmokk
Mo i Rana
Rovaniemi
geographic_facet Anchorage
Jokkmokk
Mo i Rana
Rovaniemi
genre Jokkmokk
Mo i Rana
genre_facet Jokkmokk
Mo i Rana
op_source IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
volume 352, issue 1, page 012016
ISSN 1755-1307 1755-1315
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
https://iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/352/1/012016
container_title IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
container_volume 352
container_issue 1
container_start_page 012016
_version_ 1800755406485585920