Maps of active layer thickness in northern Alaska by upscaling P-band polarimetric synthetic aperture radar retrievals

Abstract Extensive, detailed information on the spatial distribution of active layer thickness (ALT) in northern Alaska and how it evolves over time could greatly aid efforts to assess the effects of climate change on the region and also help to quantify greenhouse gas emissions generated due to per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Research Letters
Main Authors: Whitcomb, Jane, Chen, Richard, Clewley, Daniel, Kimball, John S, Pastick, Neal J, Yi, Yonghong, Moghaddam, Mahta
Other Authors: NASA
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: IOP Publishing 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad127f
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad127f
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/ad127f/pdf
Description
Summary:Abstract Extensive, detailed information on the spatial distribution of active layer thickness (ALT) in northern Alaska and how it evolves over time could greatly aid efforts to assess the effects of climate change on the region and also help to quantify greenhouse gas emissions generated due to permafrost thaw. For this reason, we have been developing high-resolution maps of ALT throughout northern Alaska. The maps are produced by upscaling from high-resolution swaths of estimated ALT retrieved from airborne P-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images collected for three different years. The upscaling was accomplished by using hundreds of thousands of randomly selected samples from the SAR-derived swaths of ALT to train a machine learning regression algorithm supported by numerous spatial data layers. In order to validate the maps, thousands of randomly selected samples of SAR-derived ALT were excluded from the training in order to serve as validation pixels; error performance calculations relative to these samples yielded root-mean-square errors (RMSEs) of 7.5–9.1 cm, with bias errors of magnitude under 0.1 cm. The maps were also compared to ALT measurements collected at a number of in situ test sites; error performance relative to the site measurements yielded RMSEs of approximately 11–12 cm and bias of 2.7–6.5 cm. These data are being used to investigate regional patterns and underlying physical controls affecting permafrost degradation in the tundra biome.