Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia

Across rural North America, aboriginal and nonaboriginal people have formed strategic alliances to defend what are perceived to be common resources and attachments to place. Thus far, little is known about how these partnerships have factored into indigenous pursuits of territorial autonomy. This ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human Organization
Main Author: Larsen, Soren C.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Informa UK Limited 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy
http://meridian.allenpress.com/human-organization/article-pdf/62/1/74/2352777/humo_62_1_63afcv8lk0dh97cy.pdf
id crinformauk:10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy
record_format openpolar
spelling crinformauk:10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy 2024-09-15T18:03:27+00:00 Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia Larsen, Soren C. 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy http://meridian.allenpress.com/human-organization/article-pdf/62/1/74/2352777/humo_62_1_63afcv8lk0dh97cy.pdf en eng Informa UK Limited Human Organization volume 62, issue 1, page 74-84 ISSN 0018-7259 1938-3525 journal-article 2003 crinformauk https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy 2024-08-01T04:12:35Z Across rural North America, aboriginal and nonaboriginal people have formed strategic alliances to defend what are perceived to be common resources and attachments to place. Thus far, little is known about how these partnerships have factored into indigenous pursuits of territorial autonomy. This article describes how the Cheslatta T'en, a Dakelh (Carrier) community in north-central British Columbia, established a measure of control over their homeland after forming an alliance with local nonnative residents. Cheslatta leaders used cultural exchanges and social networks generated by the alliance to fashion territorial initiatives that, when taken together, channel popular environmentalism, provincial forestry policies, and ancestral ethnoecology into collective identity, action, and authority. As a result, the band has attained political influence over its traditional lands without participating in the province's treaty settlement process. Interethnic partnerships in rural areas are particularly relevant to political ecology because they reveal how the common experience of powerlessness can generate new forms of resource management that synthesize diverse constructions of nature. In this way, the paper contributes to the growing empirical work on such alliances and to emerging frameworks for a political ecology of social movements. It also adds to the ethnographic literature on the colonial encounter in British Columbia by highlighting the role of interethnic collaboration in contemporary rural resource management projects. Article in Journal/Newspaper Dakelh Informa Human Organization 62 1 74 84
institution Open Polar
collection Informa
op_collection_id crinformauk
language English
description Across rural North America, aboriginal and nonaboriginal people have formed strategic alliances to defend what are perceived to be common resources and attachments to place. Thus far, little is known about how these partnerships have factored into indigenous pursuits of territorial autonomy. This article describes how the Cheslatta T'en, a Dakelh (Carrier) community in north-central British Columbia, established a measure of control over their homeland after forming an alliance with local nonnative residents. Cheslatta leaders used cultural exchanges and social networks generated by the alliance to fashion territorial initiatives that, when taken together, channel popular environmentalism, provincial forestry policies, and ancestral ethnoecology into collective identity, action, and authority. As a result, the band has attained political influence over its traditional lands without participating in the province's treaty settlement process. Interethnic partnerships in rural areas are particularly relevant to political ecology because they reveal how the common experience of powerlessness can generate new forms of resource management that synthesize diverse constructions of nature. In this way, the paper contributes to the growing empirical work on such alliances and to emerging frameworks for a political ecology of social movements. It also adds to the ethnographic literature on the colonial encounter in British Columbia by highlighting the role of interethnic collaboration in contemporary rural resource management projects.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Larsen, Soren C.
spellingShingle Larsen, Soren C.
Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
author_facet Larsen, Soren C.
author_sort Larsen, Soren C.
title Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
title_short Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
title_full Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
title_fullStr Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
title_full_unstemmed Promoting Aboriginal Territoriality Through Interethnic Alliances: The Case of the Cheslatta T'en in Northern British Columbia
title_sort promoting aboriginal territoriality through interethnic alliances: the case of the cheslatta t'en in northern british columbia
publisher Informa UK Limited
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy
http://meridian.allenpress.com/human-organization/article-pdf/62/1/74/2352777/humo_62_1_63afcv8lk0dh97cy.pdf
genre Dakelh
genre_facet Dakelh
op_source Human Organization
volume 62, issue 1, page 74-84
ISSN 0018-7259 1938-3525
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.62.1.63afcv8lk0dh97cy
container_title Human Organization
container_volume 62
container_issue 1
container_start_page 74
op_container_end_page 84
_version_ 1810440948451115008