Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer

Here we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth ( Zc , where gross photosynthesis balances autotrop...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Marine Science
Main Authors: Marra, John F., Chamberlin, W. Sean, Knudson, Carol A., Rhea, W. Joseph, Ho, Cheng
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307 2024-02-11T10:06:32+01:00 Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer Marra, John F. Chamberlin, W. Sean Knudson, Carol A. Rhea, W. Joseph Ho, Cheng 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Marine Science volume 10 ISSN 2296-7745 Ocean Engineering Water Science and Technology Aquatic Science Global and Planetary Change Oceanography journal-article 2023 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307 2024-01-26T09:56:09Z Here we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth ( Zc , where gross photosynthesis balances autotrophic respiration), (2) the depth horizon of 1% of surface photosynthetic active irradiance (Ed(0 - ,PAR), (3) depth horizon of 1% of surface Ed(488), and (4) the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum. We also use two related parameters, the depth of the mixed layer and the ratio of integral gross production to integral respiration as a scaling factor for a proxy for the critical depth. Over the course of the observational period (25 April - 7 May, 1989), the mixed layer decreased from 162 to 20 m, and Zc decreased from 64 to 35 m. The depth of 1%Ed(0 - ,PAR) followed the trajectory of Zc , while Ed(488) and the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum were about 10 m deeper, on average. These data support the criterion of the depth of “1%PAR” to describe the productive layer for more productive areas of the ocean. However, 1% of Ed(488) or the bottom of the fluorescence maximum could be used over a broader range of trophic conditions. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Frontiers (Publisher) Frontiers in Marine Science 10
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
topic Ocean Engineering
Water Science and Technology
Aquatic Science
Global and Planetary Change
Oceanography
spellingShingle Ocean Engineering
Water Science and Technology
Aquatic Science
Global and Planetary Change
Oceanography
Marra, John F.
Chamberlin, W. Sean
Knudson, Carol A.
Rhea, W. Joseph
Ho, Cheng
Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
topic_facet Ocean Engineering
Water Science and Technology
Aquatic Science
Global and Planetary Change
Oceanography
description Here we compare various parameters that are used to define the depth of the ocean’s productive layer, the euphotic zone, during the initiation of the spring phytoplankton bloom in the North Atlantic (47°N/20°W). These are (1) the compensation depth ( Zc , where gross photosynthesis balances autotrophic respiration), (2) the depth horizon of 1% of surface photosynthetic active irradiance (Ed(0 - ,PAR), (3) depth horizon of 1% of surface Ed(488), and (4) the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum. We also use two related parameters, the depth of the mixed layer and the ratio of integral gross production to integral respiration as a scaling factor for a proxy for the critical depth. Over the course of the observational period (25 April - 7 May, 1989), the mixed layer decreased from 162 to 20 m, and Zc decreased from 64 to 35 m. The depth of 1%Ed(0 - ,PAR) followed the trajectory of Zc , while Ed(488) and the depth of the bottom of the fluorescence maximum were about 10 m deeper, on average. These data support the criterion of the depth of “1%PAR” to describe the productive layer for more productive areas of the ocean. However, 1% of Ed(488) or the bottom of the fluorescence maximum could be used over a broader range of trophic conditions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Marra, John F.
Chamberlin, W. Sean
Knudson, Carol A.
Rhea, W. Joseph
Ho, Cheng
author_facet Marra, John F.
Chamberlin, W. Sean
Knudson, Carol A.
Rhea, W. Joseph
Ho, Cheng
author_sort Marra, John F.
title Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_short Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_full Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_fullStr Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_full_unstemmed Parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
title_sort parameters for the depth of the ocean’s productive layer
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307/full
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Frontiers in Marine Science
volume 10
ISSN 2296-7745
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1052307
container_title Frontiers in Marine Science
container_volume 10
_version_ 1790604313338314752