Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?

The ocean contains an abundance of biodiversity that is vital to global food security. However, marine biodiversity is declining. Marine protected areas and marine reserves have been used to protect biodiversity, conserve threatened species and rebuild exploited species, but are perceived as restric...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Marine Science
Main Authors: Jefferson, Tamlin, Palomares, Maria L. D., Lundquist, Carolyn J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/fmars.2022.826587
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/fmars.2022.826587 2024-06-23T07:51:07+00:00 Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too? Jefferson, Tamlin Palomares, Maria L. D. Lundquist, Carolyn J. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Marine Science volume 9 ISSN 2296-7745 journal-article 2022 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587 2024-06-11T04:06:03Z The ocean contains an abundance of biodiversity that is vital to global food security. However, marine biodiversity is declining. Marine protected areas and marine reserves have been used to protect biodiversity, conserve threatened species and rebuild exploited species, but are perceived as restrictive to fishing, which has slowed progress towards ocean protection targets. Here, we perform a spatial prioritisation of the ocean to protect biodiversity, threatened species and food security. Food security was quantified using catch in tonnes per km 2 , per 0.5-degree cell of the ocean, using data from the Sea Around Us, a global database of industrial, artisanal, subsistence, and recreational fishing catches. Using Representative Biodiversity Areas [RBAs (the top 30% of the ocean based on holistic measures of biodiversity)], maps of 974 threatened species, and catch data for 2,170 exploited species, we find that these multiple, competing objectives are achievable with minimal compromise. Protecting 30% of the ocean using a multi-objective solution could protect 89% of RBAs, 89% of threatened species and maintain access to fishing grounds that provide 89% of global catch. Even when prioritising food security above conservation objectives we find significant protection for biodiversity and threatened species (85% RBAs, 73% threatened species). We highlight four exploited species for improved management, as they are consistently caught in areas of high conservation importance (skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi ). We show that a globally coordinated approach to marine conservation and food security is necessary, as regional scale strategies are shown to be less efficient and may result in conflict between food security and conservation objectives. Our results add support for calls to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030, and show where protection would best protect food security and conserve biodiversity and ... Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Gadus morhua Frontiers (Publisher) Frontiers in Marine Science 9
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
description The ocean contains an abundance of biodiversity that is vital to global food security. However, marine biodiversity is declining. Marine protected areas and marine reserves have been used to protect biodiversity, conserve threatened species and rebuild exploited species, but are perceived as restrictive to fishing, which has slowed progress towards ocean protection targets. Here, we perform a spatial prioritisation of the ocean to protect biodiversity, threatened species and food security. Food security was quantified using catch in tonnes per km 2 , per 0.5-degree cell of the ocean, using data from the Sea Around Us, a global database of industrial, artisanal, subsistence, and recreational fishing catches. Using Representative Biodiversity Areas [RBAs (the top 30% of the ocean based on holistic measures of biodiversity)], maps of 974 threatened species, and catch data for 2,170 exploited species, we find that these multiple, competing objectives are achievable with minimal compromise. Protecting 30% of the ocean using a multi-objective solution could protect 89% of RBAs, 89% of threatened species and maintain access to fishing grounds that provide 89% of global catch. Even when prioritising food security above conservation objectives we find significant protection for biodiversity and threatened species (85% RBAs, 73% threatened species). We highlight four exploited species for improved management, as they are consistently caught in areas of high conservation importance (skipjack tuna, Katsuwonus pelamis yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua Chilean jack mackerel, Trachurus murphyi ). We show that a globally coordinated approach to marine conservation and food security is necessary, as regional scale strategies are shown to be less efficient and may result in conflict between food security and conservation objectives. Our results add support for calls to protect 30% of the ocean by 2030, and show where protection would best protect food security and conserve biodiversity and ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jefferson, Tamlin
Palomares, Maria L. D.
Lundquist, Carolyn J.
spellingShingle Jefferson, Tamlin
Palomares, Maria L. D.
Lundquist, Carolyn J.
Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
author_facet Jefferson, Tamlin
Palomares, Maria L. D.
Lundquist, Carolyn J.
author_sort Jefferson, Tamlin
title Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
title_short Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
title_full Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
title_fullStr Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
title_full_unstemmed Safeguarding Seafood Security, Marine Biodiversity and Threatened Species: Can We Have Our Fish and Eat It too?
title_sort safeguarding seafood security, marine biodiversity and threatened species: can we have our fish and eat it too?
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587/full
genre atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
genre_facet atlantic cod
Gadus morhua
op_source Frontiers in Marine Science
volume 9
ISSN 2296-7745
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826587
container_title Frontiers in Marine Science
container_volume 9
_version_ 1802642109474275328