Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water

The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Ketten, Darlene R., Simmons, James A., Riquimaroux, Hiroshi, Simmons, Andrea Megela
Other Authors: Office of Naval Research
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/fevo.2021.661216
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/fevo.2021.661216 2024-05-12T08:10:03+00:00 Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water Ketten, Darlene R. Simmons, James A. Riquimaroux, Hiroshi Simmons, Andrea Megela Office of Naval Research Office of Naval Research 2021 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution volume 9 ISSN 2296-701X Ecology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2021 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216 2024-04-18T07:56:33Z The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of sound and wavelengths in air vs. water, that may be reflected in adaptations in their auditory systems and peak spectra of out-going signals for similarly sized prey. We examined the anatomy of the peripheral auditory system of two species of FM bat (big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus; Japanese house bat Pipistrellus abramus ) and two toothed whales (harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena; bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus ) using ultra high resolution (11–100 micron) isotropic voxel computed tomography (helical and microCT). Significant differences were found for oval and round window location, cochlear length, basilar membrane gradients, neural distributions, cochlear spiral morphometry and curvature, and basilar membrane suspension distributions. Length correlates with body mass, not hearing ranges. High and low frequency hearing range cut-offs correlate with basilar membrane thickness/width ratios and the cochlear radius of curvature. These features are predictive of high and low frequency hearing limits in all ears examined. The ears of the harbor porpoise, the highest frequency echolocator in the study, had significantly greater stiffness, higher basal basilar membrane ratios, and bilateral bony support for 60% of the basilar membrane length. The porpoise’s basilar membrane includes a “foveal” region with “stretched” frequency representation and relatively constant membrane thickness/width ratio values similar to those reported for some bat species. Both species of bats and the harbor porpoise displayed unusual stapedial input locations and low ratios of cochlear radii, specializations that may enhance higher ultrasonic frequency signal resolution and deter low frequency cochlear propagation. Article in Journal/Newspaper Phocoena phocoena toothed whale toothed whales Frontiers (Publisher) Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 9
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
topic Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Ketten, Darlene R.
Simmons, James A.
Riquimaroux, Hiroshi
Simmons, Andrea Megela
Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
topic_facet Ecology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description The similarity of acoustic tasks performed by odontocete (toothed whale) and microchiropteran (insectivorous bat) biosonar suggests they may have common ultrasonic signal reception and processing mechanisms. However, there are also significant media and prey dependent differences, notably speed of sound and wavelengths in air vs. water, that may be reflected in adaptations in their auditory systems and peak spectra of out-going signals for similarly sized prey. We examined the anatomy of the peripheral auditory system of two species of FM bat (big brown bat Eptesicus fuscus; Japanese house bat Pipistrellus abramus ) and two toothed whales (harbor porpoise Phocoena phocoena; bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus ) using ultra high resolution (11–100 micron) isotropic voxel computed tomography (helical and microCT). Significant differences were found for oval and round window location, cochlear length, basilar membrane gradients, neural distributions, cochlear spiral morphometry and curvature, and basilar membrane suspension distributions. Length correlates with body mass, not hearing ranges. High and low frequency hearing range cut-offs correlate with basilar membrane thickness/width ratios and the cochlear radius of curvature. These features are predictive of high and low frequency hearing limits in all ears examined. The ears of the harbor porpoise, the highest frequency echolocator in the study, had significantly greater stiffness, higher basal basilar membrane ratios, and bilateral bony support for 60% of the basilar membrane length. The porpoise’s basilar membrane includes a “foveal” region with “stretched” frequency representation and relatively constant membrane thickness/width ratio values similar to those reported for some bat species. Both species of bats and the harbor porpoise displayed unusual stapedial input locations and low ratios of cochlear radii, specializations that may enhance higher ultrasonic frequency signal resolution and deter low frequency cochlear propagation.
author2 Office of Naval Research
Office of Naval Research
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ketten, Darlene R.
Simmons, James A.
Riquimaroux, Hiroshi
Simmons, Andrea Megela
author_facet Ketten, Darlene R.
Simmons, James A.
Riquimaroux, Hiroshi
Simmons, Andrea Megela
author_sort Ketten, Darlene R.
title Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
title_short Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
title_full Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
title_fullStr Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
title_full_unstemmed Functional Analyses of Peripheral Auditory System Adaptations for Echolocation in Air vs. Water
title_sort functional analyses of peripheral auditory system adaptations for echolocation in air vs. water
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2021
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216/full
genre Phocoena phocoena
toothed whale
toothed whales
genre_facet Phocoena phocoena
toothed whale
toothed whales
op_source Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
volume 9
ISSN 2296-701X
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.661216
container_title Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 9
_version_ 1798853424365699072