Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses

Extreme precipitation events are becoming more common in the Arctic as the climate warms, but characterizing these events is notoriously challenging. Atmospheric reanalyses have become popular tools for climate studies in data-sparse regions such as the Arctic. While modern reanalyses have been show...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Environmental Science
Main Authors: Loeb, Nicole A., Crawford, Alex, Stroeve, Julienne C., Hanesiak, John
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929 2024-09-09T19:19:58+00:00 Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses Loeb, Nicole A. Crawford, Alex Stroeve, Julienne C. Hanesiak, John 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Environmental Science volume 10 ISSN 2296-665X journal-article 2022 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929 2024-08-13T04:05:49Z Extreme precipitation events are becoming more common in the Arctic as the climate warms, but characterizing these events is notoriously challenging. Atmospheric reanalyses have become popular tools for climate studies in data-sparse regions such as the Arctic. While modern reanalyses have been shown to perform reasonably well at reproducing Arctic climate, their ability to represent extreme precipitation events has not been investigated in depth. In this study, three of the most recent reanalyses, ERA-5, MERRA-2, and CFSR, are compared to surface precipitation observations in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland from 1980 to 2016 to assess how well they represent the most intense observed events. Overall, the reanalyses struggled to match observed accumulations from individual events (−0.11 ≤ r ≤ 0.47) but matched the observed seasonality of precipitation extremes. The region with the strongest match between observations and reanalyses was Southwest Greenland. Performance varies by event, and the best match between reanalyses and station observations may have a spatial/temporal offset (up to one grid cell or 1 day). The three products saw similar performance in general; however, ERA-5 tends to see slightly higher correlations and lower biases than MERRA-2 or CFSR. Considering the limitations of in situ observations, these results suggest that the reanalyses are capable of representing aggregate extreme precipitation (e.g., seasonal or annual time scales), but struggle to consistently match the timing and location of specific observed events. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Greenland Frontiers (Publisher) Arctic Greenland Merra ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816) Frontiers in Environmental Science 10
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
description Extreme precipitation events are becoming more common in the Arctic as the climate warms, but characterizing these events is notoriously challenging. Atmospheric reanalyses have become popular tools for climate studies in data-sparse regions such as the Arctic. While modern reanalyses have been shown to perform reasonably well at reproducing Arctic climate, their ability to represent extreme precipitation events has not been investigated in depth. In this study, three of the most recent reanalyses, ERA-5, MERRA-2, and CFSR, are compared to surface precipitation observations in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland from 1980 to 2016 to assess how well they represent the most intense observed events. Overall, the reanalyses struggled to match observed accumulations from individual events (−0.11 ≤ r ≤ 0.47) but matched the observed seasonality of precipitation extremes. The region with the strongest match between observations and reanalyses was Southwest Greenland. Performance varies by event, and the best match between reanalyses and station observations may have a spatial/temporal offset (up to one grid cell or 1 day). The three products saw similar performance in general; however, ERA-5 tends to see slightly higher correlations and lower biases than MERRA-2 or CFSR. Considering the limitations of in situ observations, these results suggest that the reanalyses are capable of representing aggregate extreme precipitation (e.g., seasonal or annual time scales), but struggle to consistently match the timing and location of specific observed events.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Loeb, Nicole A.
Crawford, Alex
Stroeve, Julienne C.
Hanesiak, John
spellingShingle Loeb, Nicole A.
Crawford, Alex
Stroeve, Julienne C.
Hanesiak, John
Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
author_facet Loeb, Nicole A.
Crawford, Alex
Stroeve, Julienne C.
Hanesiak, John
author_sort Loeb, Nicole A.
title Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
title_short Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
title_full Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
title_fullStr Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
title_full_unstemmed Extreme Precipitation in the Eastern Canadian Arctic and Greenland: An Evaluation of Atmospheric Reanalyses
title_sort extreme precipitation in the eastern canadian arctic and greenland: an evaluation of atmospheric reanalyses
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929/full
long_lat ENVELOPE(12.615,12.615,65.816,65.816)
geographic Arctic
Greenland
Merra
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
Merra
genre Arctic
Greenland
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
op_source Frontiers in Environmental Science
volume 10
ISSN 2296-665X
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.866929
container_title Frontiers in Environmental Science
container_volume 10
_version_ 1809760058915946496