Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement

Deep mining is an inevitable trend in China and the world, for which the construction of deep and large vertical shafts is the primary task. A shaft sinking headframe is a basic structure for supporting various hoisting and sinking equipment during vertical shaft construction. The design of the shaf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Earth Science
Main Authors: Wang, Bo, Liu, Zhiqiang, Yuan, Shuai
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941126
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.941126/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/feart.2022.941126
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/feart.2022.941126 2024-03-03T08:47:55+00:00 Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement Wang, Bo Liu, Zhiqiang Yuan, Shuai 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941126 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.941126/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Earth Science volume 10 ISSN 2296-6463 General Earth and Planetary Sciences journal-article 2022 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941126 2024-02-03T23:18:17Z Deep mining is an inevitable trend in China and the world, for which the construction of deep and large vertical shafts is the primary task. A shaft sinking headframe is a basic structure for supporting various hoisting and sinking equipment during vertical shaft construction. The design of the shaft sinking headframe is challenging due to the significant differences in the geometry and working load compared to conventional steel structures. Recently, the effect of uneven foundation settlement on the shaft sinking headframe has been of great concern when sinking shafts by the freezing sinking method or in permafrost soil areas. In this study, finite element calculations were performed to investigate the mechanical behavior of the SA-3 shaft sinking headframe under uneven foundation settlement (0.001–0.006 L ) and normal working-load conditions. The results indicate that the most unfavorable condition for the stress of members is the diagonal double foundation settlement, and in the view of the geometric offset, the most unfavorable condition is the same-side double foundation settlement. The corner members near the settled foundation were changed from a state of compression to tension. Uneven foundation settlement of less than 0.001 L is acceptable for the safety and service performance of the shaft sinking headframe. These criteria can be used for reference in engineering practice. Article in Journal/Newspaper permafrost Frontiers (Publisher) Frontiers in Earth Science 10
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
topic General Earth and Planetary Sciences
spellingShingle General Earth and Planetary Sciences
Wang, Bo
Liu, Zhiqiang
Yuan, Shuai
Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
topic_facet General Earth and Planetary Sciences
description Deep mining is an inevitable trend in China and the world, for which the construction of deep and large vertical shafts is the primary task. A shaft sinking headframe is a basic structure for supporting various hoisting and sinking equipment during vertical shaft construction. The design of the shaft sinking headframe is challenging due to the significant differences in the geometry and working load compared to conventional steel structures. Recently, the effect of uneven foundation settlement on the shaft sinking headframe has been of great concern when sinking shafts by the freezing sinking method or in permafrost soil areas. In this study, finite element calculations were performed to investigate the mechanical behavior of the SA-3 shaft sinking headframe under uneven foundation settlement (0.001–0.006 L ) and normal working-load conditions. The results indicate that the most unfavorable condition for the stress of members is the diagonal double foundation settlement, and in the view of the geometric offset, the most unfavorable condition is the same-side double foundation settlement. The corner members near the settled foundation were changed from a state of compression to tension. Uneven foundation settlement of less than 0.001 L is acceptable for the safety and service performance of the shaft sinking headframe. These criteria can be used for reference in engineering practice.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wang, Bo
Liu, Zhiqiang
Yuan, Shuai
author_facet Wang, Bo
Liu, Zhiqiang
Yuan, Shuai
author_sort Wang, Bo
title Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
title_short Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
title_full Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
title_fullStr Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
title_full_unstemmed Behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
title_sort behavior of large shaft sinking headframe subjected to uneven foundation settlement
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941126
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feart.2022.941126/full
genre permafrost
genre_facet permafrost
op_source Frontiers in Earth Science
volume 10
ISSN 2296-6463
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.941126
container_title Frontiers in Earth Science
container_volume 10
_version_ 1792504209345609728