Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis

Literature reports the chemical constituent yields of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosol collected using a range of aerosol collection strategies. The number of puffs to deplete an ENDS product varies widely, but collections often consist of data from the first 50–100 puffs. However...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Chemistry
Main Authors: Jameson, J. Brian, Wang, Jiaming, Bailey, Patrick C., Oldham, Michael J., Smith, Cameron R., Jeong, Lena N., Cook, David K., Bates, Austin L., Ullah, Sifat, Pennington, Alexander S. C., Gillman, I. Gene
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Frontiers Media SA 2023
Subjects:
DML
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967/full
id crfrontiers:10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967
record_format openpolar
spelling crfrontiers:10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967 2024-02-11T10:03:22+01:00 Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis Jameson, J. Brian Wang, Jiaming Bailey, Patrick C. Oldham, Michael J. Smith, Cameron R. Jeong, Lena N. Cook, David K. Bates, Austin L. Ullah, Sifat Pennington, Alexander S. C. Gillman, I. Gene 2023 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967/full unknown Frontiers Media SA https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Frontiers in Chemistry volume 11 ISSN 2296-2646 General Chemistry journal-article 2023 crfrontiers https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967 2024-01-26T10:00:00Z Literature reports the chemical constituent yields of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosol collected using a range of aerosol collection strategies. The number of puffs to deplete an ENDS product varies widely, but collections often consist of data from the first 50–100 puffs. However, it is not clear whether these discrete puff blocks are representative of constituent yields over the life of a pod. We aimed to assess the effect of differing aerosol collection strategies on reported yields for select chemical constituents in the aerosol of closed pod-based ENDS products. Constituents analyzed were chosen to reflect important classes of compounds from the Final Premarket Tobacco Product Application Guidance. Yields were normalized to total device mass loss (DML). Collection strategies that consisted of partial pod collection were valid for determining yields of constituents whose DML normalized yields were consistent for the duration of pod life. These included primary aerosol constituents, such as propylene glycol, glycerol, and nicotine, and whole pod yields could be determined from initial puff blocks. However, changes were observed in the yields of some metals, some carbonyl compounds, and glycidol over pod life in a chemical constituent and product dependent manner. These results suggest that collection strategies consisting of initial puff block collections require validation per chemical constituent/product and are not appropriate for chemical constituents with variable yields over pod life. Whole pod collection increased sensitivity and accuracy in determining metal, carbonyl, and glycidol yields compared to puff block-based collection methodologies for all products tested. Article in Journal/Newspaper DML Frontiers (Publisher) Frontiers in Chemistry 11
institution Open Polar
collection Frontiers (Publisher)
op_collection_id crfrontiers
language unknown
topic General Chemistry
spellingShingle General Chemistry
Jameson, J. Brian
Wang, Jiaming
Bailey, Patrick C.
Oldham, Michael J.
Smith, Cameron R.
Jeong, Lena N.
Cook, David K.
Bates, Austin L.
Ullah, Sifat
Pennington, Alexander S. C.
Gillman, I. Gene
Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
topic_facet General Chemistry
description Literature reports the chemical constituent yields of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) aerosol collected using a range of aerosol collection strategies. The number of puffs to deplete an ENDS product varies widely, but collections often consist of data from the first 50–100 puffs. However, it is not clear whether these discrete puff blocks are representative of constituent yields over the life of a pod. We aimed to assess the effect of differing aerosol collection strategies on reported yields for select chemical constituents in the aerosol of closed pod-based ENDS products. Constituents analyzed were chosen to reflect important classes of compounds from the Final Premarket Tobacco Product Application Guidance. Yields were normalized to total device mass loss (DML). Collection strategies that consisted of partial pod collection were valid for determining yields of constituents whose DML normalized yields were consistent for the duration of pod life. These included primary aerosol constituents, such as propylene glycol, glycerol, and nicotine, and whole pod yields could be determined from initial puff blocks. However, changes were observed in the yields of some metals, some carbonyl compounds, and glycidol over pod life in a chemical constituent and product dependent manner. These results suggest that collection strategies consisting of initial puff block collections require validation per chemical constituent/product and are not appropriate for chemical constituents with variable yields over pod life. Whole pod collection increased sensitivity and accuracy in determining metal, carbonyl, and glycidol yields compared to puff block-based collection methodologies for all products tested.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jameson, J. Brian
Wang, Jiaming
Bailey, Patrick C.
Oldham, Michael J.
Smith, Cameron R.
Jeong, Lena N.
Cook, David K.
Bates, Austin L.
Ullah, Sifat
Pennington, Alexander S. C.
Gillman, I. Gene
author_facet Jameson, J. Brian
Wang, Jiaming
Bailey, Patrick C.
Oldham, Michael J.
Smith, Cameron R.
Jeong, Lena N.
Cook, David K.
Bates, Austin L.
Ullah, Sifat
Pennington, Alexander S. C.
Gillman, I. Gene
author_sort Jameson, J. Brian
title Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
title_short Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
title_full Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
title_fullStr Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
title_full_unstemmed Determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
title_sort determination of chemical constituent yields in e-cigarette aerosol using partial and whole pod collections, a comparative analysis
publisher Frontiers Media SA
publishDate 2023
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967/full
genre DML
genre_facet DML
op_source Frontiers in Chemistry
volume 11
ISSN 2296-2646
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2023.1223967
container_title Frontiers in Chemistry
container_volume 11
_version_ 1790599592335638528