Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laws, Edward
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: H1 Connect 2008
Subjects:
Arctic
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1122908.580008
id crf1000:10.3410/f.1122908.580008
record_format openpolar
spelling crf1000:10.3410/f.1122908.580008 2024-06-02T08:00:42+00:00 Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem. Laws, Edward 2008 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1122908.580008 unknown H1 Connect Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature dataset 2008 crf1000 https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1122908.580008 2024-05-07T13:52:18Z Dataset Arctic F1000Research Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection F1000Research
op_collection_id crf1000
language unknown
format Dataset
author Laws, Edward
spellingShingle Laws, Edward
Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
author_facet Laws, Edward
author_sort Laws, Edward
title Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
title_short Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
title_full Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
title_fullStr Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Opinions recommendation of Counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an Arctic pelagic ecosystem.
title_sort faculty opinions recommendation of counterintuitive carbon-to-nutrient coupling in an arctic pelagic ecosystem.
publisher H1 Connect
publishDate 2008
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1122908.580008
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1122908.580008
_version_ 1800744826719698944

Similar Items