Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Priscu, John
Format: Dataset
Language:unknown
Published: Faculty Opinions Ltd 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1014337.193290
id crf1000:10.3410/f.1014337.193290
record_format openpolar
spelling crf1000:10.3410/f.1014337.193290 2024-06-02T07:55:53+00:00 Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts. Priscu, John 2003 http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1014337.193290 unknown Faculty Opinions Ltd Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature dataset 2003 crf1000 https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1014337.193290 2024-05-07T13:52:20Z Dataset Antarc* Antarctic F1000Research Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection F1000Research
op_collection_id crf1000
language unknown
format Dataset
author Priscu, John
spellingShingle Priscu, John
Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
author_facet Priscu, John
author_sort Priscu, John
title Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
title_short Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
title_full Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
title_fullStr Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
title_full_unstemmed Faculty Opinions recommendation of A novel Antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
title_sort faculty opinions recommendation of a novel antarctic microbial endolithic community within gypsum crusts.
publisher Faculty Opinions Ltd
publishDate 2003
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.1014337.193290
geographic Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
op_source Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3410/f.1014337.193290
_version_ 1800751849507127296