Shifting practise: recognizing Indigenous rights holders in research ethics review

• Published in: Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal
• Main Authors: Bull, Julie, Beazley, Karen, Shea, Jennifer, MacQuarrie, Colleen, Hudson, Amy, Shaw, Kelly, Brunger, Fern, Kavanagh, Chandra, Gagne, Brenda
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Emerald 2019
• Subjects: Canada; Happy Valley; Newfoundland; Happy Valley-Goose Bay; inuit; inuktitut
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/qrom-04-2019-1748; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QROM-04-2019-1748/full/xml; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/QROM-04-2019-1748/full/html

Purpose For many Indigenous nations globally, ethics is a conversation. The purpose of this paper is to share and mobilize knowledge to build relationships and capacities regarding the ethics review and approval of research with Indigenous peoples throughout Atlantic Canada. The authors share key principles that emerged for shifting practices that recognize Indigenous rights holders through ethical research review practice. Design/methodology/approach The NunatuKavut Inuit hosted and led a two-day gathering on March 2019 in Happy Valley-Goose Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador, to promote a regional dialogue on Indigenous Research Governance. It brought together Indigenous Nations within the Atlantic Region and invited guests from institutional ethics review boards and researchers in the region to address the principles-to-policy-to-practice gap as it relates to the research ethics review process. Called “Naalak”, an Inuktitut word that means “to listen and to pay close attention”, the gathering created a dynamic moment of respect and understanding of how to work better together and support one another in research with Indigenous peoples on Indigenous lands. Findings Through this process of dialogue and reflection, emergent principles and practices for “good” research ethics were collectively identified. Open dialogue between institutional ethics boards and Indigenous research review committees acknowledged past and current research practices from Indigenous peoples’ perspectives; supported and encouraged community-led research; articulated and exemplified Indigenous ownership and control of data; promoted and practiced ethical and responsible research with Indigenous peoples; and supported and emphasized rights based approaches within the current research regulatory system. Key principles emerged for shifting paradigms to honour Indigenous rights holders through ethical research practice, including: recognizing Indigenous peoples as rights holders with sovereignty over research; accepting collective responsibility ...