Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments

Purpose Logistics service performance measurement (PM) is a fundamental activity pertaining to the achievement of logistics goals and the improvement of services. The choice of logistics PM criteria depends on stakeholder goals and expectations, including logistics service providers, customers and g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Maritime Business Review
Main Authors: Panayides, Photis, Borch, Odd Jarl, Henk, Anastasiya
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Emerald 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/xml
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/html
id cremerald:10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021
record_format openpolar
spelling cremerald:10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021 2024-06-09T07:44:17+00:00 Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments Panayides, Photis Borch, Odd Jarl Henk, Anastasiya 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021 https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/xml https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/html en eng Emerald https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies Maritime Business Review volume 3, issue 4, page 431-448 ISSN 2397-3757 journal-article 2018 cremerald https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021 2024-05-15T13:21:23Z Purpose Logistics service performance measurement (PM) is a fundamental activity pertaining to the achievement of logistics goals and the improvement of services. The choice of logistics PM criteria depends on stakeholder goals and expectations, including logistics service providers, customers and government and regulatory institutions. PM is especially challenging in areas where high values are at stake, several actors are involved and uncertainty about cause-and-effect relations is high. This paper aims to examine the measurement of performance in offshore oil and gas logistics, which has unique characteristics such as a supply chain (SC) exposed to a harsh environment, the presence of several independent carriers and a highly specialised and costly set of vessels involved in long-distance transport legs. Design/methodology/approach The study is designed as a multiple case study of two Norwegian shipping companies and two international oil and gas companies. Data were collected from several parts of the offshore service SC in several Arctic oil and gas fields. Findings This paper sheds light on the performance of the SC and presents key performance indicators for logistics operations. It concludes that the measurement of SC performance must be context-specific and emphasis needs to be placed on the degree of uncertainty and inter-dependency related to the SC in question. Originality/value The study suggests a list of context-specific key performance indicators for offshore logistics with a special emphasis on the peculiarities of a harsh operational environment. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Emerald Arctic Maritime Business Review 3 4 431 448
institution Open Polar
collection Emerald
op_collection_id cremerald
language English
description Purpose Logistics service performance measurement (PM) is a fundamental activity pertaining to the achievement of logistics goals and the improvement of services. The choice of logistics PM criteria depends on stakeholder goals and expectations, including logistics service providers, customers and government and regulatory institutions. PM is especially challenging in areas where high values are at stake, several actors are involved and uncertainty about cause-and-effect relations is high. This paper aims to examine the measurement of performance in offshore oil and gas logistics, which has unique characteristics such as a supply chain (SC) exposed to a harsh environment, the presence of several independent carriers and a highly specialised and costly set of vessels involved in long-distance transport legs. Design/methodology/approach The study is designed as a multiple case study of two Norwegian shipping companies and two international oil and gas companies. Data were collected from several parts of the offshore service SC in several Arctic oil and gas fields. Findings This paper sheds light on the performance of the SC and presents key performance indicators for logistics operations. It concludes that the measurement of SC performance must be context-specific and emphasis needs to be placed on the degree of uncertainty and inter-dependency related to the SC in question. Originality/value The study suggests a list of context-specific key performance indicators for offshore logistics with a special emphasis on the peculiarities of a harsh operational environment.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Panayides, Photis
Borch, Odd Jarl
Henk, Anastasiya
spellingShingle Panayides, Photis
Borch, Odd Jarl
Henk, Anastasiya
Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
author_facet Panayides, Photis
Borch, Odd Jarl
Henk, Anastasiya
author_sort Panayides, Photis
title Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
title_short Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
title_full Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
title_fullStr Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
title_full_unstemmed Measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
title_sort measurement challenges of supply chain performance in complex shipping environments
publisher Emerald
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/xml
https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MABR-07-2018-0021/full/html
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source Maritime Business Review
volume 3, issue 4, page 431-448
ISSN 2397-3757
op_rights https://www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-07-2018-0021
container_title Maritime Business Review
container_volume 3
container_issue 4
container_start_page 431
op_container_end_page 448
_version_ 1801373050805944320