Does a name make a difference? The neo-documentalist movement, where does it stand after 27 years 1996–2023

• Published in: Journal of Documentation
• Main Author: Lund, Niels Windfeld
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Emerald 2023
• Subjects: Tromsø
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-04-2023-0070; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-04-2023-0070/full/xml; https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/JD-04-2023-0070/full/html

Purpose The purpose of the paper is to analyze how the Neo-documentalist movement, initiated in 1996 by Michael Buckland, Boyd Rayward and Niels Lund, has evolved in its 27 years history, how the choice of documentation as name of the new program in Tromsø has made a difference in the LIS field and how different documentation scholars around the world has participated and approached the movement until now. Design/methodology/approach The paper has approached the “Neo-documentalist movement” in a historical perspective from 1996 to 2023 discussing what difference does the choice of a concept make, when the concept of documentation is chosen instead of information in the name of a program and for the general discussion of the object of an academic field like Library and Information Science. Findings The analysis shows that it did make a difference to choose the concept of documentation as name of the program in Tromsø and the Neo-documentalist movement contributed to a new focus and discussion of the informative objects, the documents and their creation, not only in Tromsø, but in different parts of the world across linguistic borders. Originality/value The paper is original by the fact that it is the first time that the neo documentalist movement has been reviewed on a global scale across linguistic barriers. It has value by a discussion of the ways in which a choice of concept matter in relation to defining a field and the research agenda.