Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.

Bibliographic Details
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.34773.012
id crelifesciences:10.7554/elife.34773.012
record_format openpolar
spelling crelifesciences:10.7554/elife.34773.012 2023-07-23T04:18:45+02:00 Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta. (A) Lower dentition homology and positions of functionally analogous bone-cracking teeth. Jaws are scaled to the same length. (B) Macrowear data from lower first molar samples of Crocuta crocuta (Sub-Saharan Africa) (data from [DeSantis et al., 2017]), Borophagus parvus (new data based on AMNH specimens from (1) Quibiris Formation, Arizona and (2) Big Sandy Formation, Arizona), and Canis lupus (new data based on AMNH specimens from Alberta, Canada). (C) Hunter-Schreger Band (HSB) enamel microstructure patterns in the upper and lower dentitions of the three carnivorans; darker shades indicate higher degree of zig-zag HSB specialization (modified from Figure 2 from [Tseng, 2011]). (D) Morphospace of relative warp (RW) axes from a geometric morphometric analysis of fossil (shaded symbols) and extant (black symbols) canid and hyaenid cranial shape, and (E) Phylogenetic relationships of borophagine canids (top) and hyaenids (bottom) plotted onto morphometric data, with Canis indicated by black triangle. Both (D) and (E) are modified from Figure 5 from Tseng and Wang (2011). (F) von Mises stress distributions in the crania during right fourth premolar bite simulations using 3-D finite element analysis, with warmer colors indicating higher stress. Crania are scaled to the same length (modified from Figure 7 from [Tseng, 2013]). 2018-05-22T00:00:54Z http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.34773.012 unknown eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd component 2018 crelifesciences https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.34773.012 2023-07-05T08:34:48Z Other/Unknown Material Canis lupus eLife (E-Journal - via Crossref) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection eLife (E-Journal - via Crossref)
op_collection_id crelifesciences
language unknown
format Other/Unknown Material
title Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
spellingShingle Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
title_short Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
title_full Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
title_fullStr Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
title_full_unstemmed Figure 6. Comparison of craniodental functional morphology in Canis, Borophagus, and Crocuta.
title_sort figure 6. comparison of craniodental functional morphology in canis, borophagus, and crocuta.
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/elife.34773.012
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.34773.012
_version_ 1772181294512340992