What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human

Abstract An ethics of care in nature conservation must ask not only whose voices are heard, but also which interspecies relations that come to matter. Inspired by Jane Bennett’s question about how ethical codes are transformed into laudable acts in interspecies relations, this article explores align...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Humanities
Main Author: Lien, Marianne E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Duke University Press 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712511
https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article-pdf/14/2/457/1613836/457lien.pdf
id crdukeunivpr:10.1215/22011919-9712511
record_format openpolar
spelling crdukeunivpr:10.1215/22011919-9712511 2024-06-02T08:11:49+00:00 What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human Lien, Marianne E. 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712511 https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article-pdf/14/2/457/1613836/457lien.pdf en eng Duke University Press Environmental Humanities volume 14, issue 2, page 457-474 ISSN 2201-1919 2201-1919 journal-article 2022 crdukeunivpr https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712511 2024-05-07T13:16:08Z Abstract An ethics of care in nature conservation must ask not only whose voices are heard, but also which interspecies relations that come to matter. Inspired by Jane Bennett’s question about how ethical codes are transformed into laudable acts in interspecies relations, this article explores alignments between affective enchantment and interspecies response-ability. Juxtaposing two ethnographic sites in Norway, salmon aquaculture and nature conservation, Marianne E. Lien argues that ethical conduct calls for relational interspecies commitment beyond mere affect: enchantment offers no guarantee of animal welfare. But nor does a set of legal regulations. The first section of this article explores the practical enactment of sentient salmon in Norwegian aquaculture, and details interspecies response-ability and care through practices where legal regulations and affective registers intersect. In the second section Lien turns to what some call untouched nature, while others call it home, and shows how enchantment of nature in the abstract may legitimate the dispossession of the vital relations between local people and their worlds. Both cases suggest the need to pay close attention to relational and vernacular arts of noticing that have been cultivated by others. Shifting our attention from the outsider’s gaze as an affective enchantment toward the relationality of others, we may notice the myriad of generative interspecies relations that unfold quietly, in a minor chord, and often in unexpected places. The article draws on extensive fieldwork within aquaculture production sites in western Norway and in the coastal regions of Varanger, North Norway. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Norway Varanger Duke University Press Norway Environmental Humanities 14 2 457 474
institution Open Polar
collection Duke University Press
op_collection_id crdukeunivpr
language English
description Abstract An ethics of care in nature conservation must ask not only whose voices are heard, but also which interspecies relations that come to matter. Inspired by Jane Bennett’s question about how ethical codes are transformed into laudable acts in interspecies relations, this article explores alignments between affective enchantment and interspecies response-ability. Juxtaposing two ethnographic sites in Norway, salmon aquaculture and nature conservation, Marianne E. Lien argues that ethical conduct calls for relational interspecies commitment beyond mere affect: enchantment offers no guarantee of animal welfare. But nor does a set of legal regulations. The first section of this article explores the practical enactment of sentient salmon in Norwegian aquaculture, and details interspecies response-ability and care through practices where legal regulations and affective registers intersect. In the second section Lien turns to what some call untouched nature, while others call it home, and shows how enchantment of nature in the abstract may legitimate the dispossession of the vital relations between local people and their worlds. Both cases suggest the need to pay close attention to relational and vernacular arts of noticing that have been cultivated by others. Shifting our attention from the outsider’s gaze as an affective enchantment toward the relationality of others, we may notice the myriad of generative interspecies relations that unfold quietly, in a minor chord, and often in unexpected places. The article draws on extensive fieldwork within aquaculture production sites in western Norway and in the coastal regions of Varanger, North Norway.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lien, Marianne E.
spellingShingle Lien, Marianne E.
What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
author_facet Lien, Marianne E.
author_sort Lien, Marianne E.
title What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
title_short What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
title_full What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
title_fullStr What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
title_full_unstemmed What’s Love Got to Do with It? Care, Curiosity, and Commitment in Ethnography beyond the Human
title_sort what’s love got to do with it? care, curiosity, and commitment in ethnography beyond the human
publisher Duke University Press
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712511
https://read.dukeupress.edu/environmental-humanities/article-pdf/14/2/457/1613836/457lien.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre North Norway
Varanger
genre_facet North Norway
Varanger
op_source Environmental Humanities
volume 14, issue 2, page 457-474
ISSN 2201-1919 2201-1919
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9712511
container_title Environmental Humanities
container_volume 14
container_issue 2
container_start_page 457
op_container_end_page 474
_version_ 1800758095220047872