The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories

The end of the Great War was the beginning of a long string of problems requiring immediate solutions, one of the most important of which being the repatriation of former prisoners of war. Given the fact that there were a large number of prisoners as a result of the huge amount of troops engaged in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies
Main Author: Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8
id crdegruyter:10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8
record_format openpolar
spelling crdegruyter:10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8 2023-05-15T16:18:27+02:00 The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina 2011 http://dx.doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8 en eng Walter de Gruyter GmbH The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies volume 3, issue 1, page 145-159 ISSN 2067-225X 2067-1725 journal-article 2011 crdegruyter https://doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8 2022-04-14T05:04:28Z The end of the Great War was the beginning of a long string of problems requiring immediate solutions, one of the most important of which being the repatriation of former prisoners of war. Given the fact that there were a large number of prisoners as a result of the huge amount of troops engaged in the conflict, we can approximate a number of 6,637,000 prisoners at the end of the war. This situation did not remain without consequences in the international debate. At the Paris Peace Conference, the General Secretariat had organized a Special Committee on all matters relating to prisoners. The lead of the Commission was entrusted to Fridtjof Nansen, explorer, scientist and public figure of the period. However, there were a number of difficulties generated by the absence of Russia from the Peace Conference. This country did not obey any decisions of the Commission, having neither rights, nor duties. To solve the problems, the High Commissioner made use of the prestige given by the League of Nations in order to facilitate the carrying out of his duty, but in reality the effort to repatriate the prisoners was supported by humanitarian agencies and private organizations, for example the International Red Cross. Overall the Mission led by Dr. Nansen managed to repatriate 427,885 prisoners, 19,188 of whom were Romanians. Article in Journal/Newspaper Fridtjof Nansen De Gruyter (via Crossref) Fridtjof ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567) The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies 3 1 145 159
institution Open Polar
collection De Gruyter (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crdegruyter
language English
description The end of the Great War was the beginning of a long string of problems requiring immediate solutions, one of the most important of which being the repatriation of former prisoners of war. Given the fact that there were a large number of prisoners as a result of the huge amount of troops engaged in the conflict, we can approximate a number of 6,637,000 prisoners at the end of the war. This situation did not remain without consequences in the international debate. At the Paris Peace Conference, the General Secretariat had organized a Special Committee on all matters relating to prisoners. The lead of the Commission was entrusted to Fridtjof Nansen, explorer, scientist and public figure of the period. However, there were a number of difficulties generated by the absence of Russia from the Peace Conference. This country did not obey any decisions of the Commission, having neither rights, nor duties. To solve the problems, the High Commissioner made use of the prestige given by the League of Nations in order to facilitate the carrying out of his duty, but in reality the effort to repatriate the prisoners was supported by humanitarian agencies and private organizations, for example the International Red Cross. Overall the Mission led by Dr. Nansen managed to repatriate 427,885 prisoners, 19,188 of whom were Romanians.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina
spellingShingle Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina
The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
author_facet Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina
author_sort Cazacu, Ioana Ecaterina
title The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
title_short The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
title_full The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
title_fullStr The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
title_full_unstemmed The Nansen Commission and the Romanian Prisoners of War’s repatriation from the Russian territories
title_sort nansen commission and the romanian prisoners of war’s repatriation from the russian territories
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
publishDate 2011
url http://dx.doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567)
geographic Fridtjof
geographic_facet Fridtjof
genre Fridtjof Nansen
genre_facet Fridtjof Nansen
op_source The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies
volume 3, issue 1, page 145-159
ISSN 2067-225X 2067-1725
op_doi https://doi.org/10.53604/rjbns.v3i1_8
container_title The Romanian Journal for Baltic and Nordic Studies
container_volume 3
container_issue 1
container_start_page 145
op_container_end_page 159
_version_ 1766004618978918400