Overview of raptor monitoring activities in Europe

• Published in: Acrocephalus
• Main Authors: Vrezec, Al, Duke, Guy, Kovács, András, Saurola, Pertti, Wernham, Chris, Burfield, Ian, Movalli, Paola, Bertoncelj, Irena
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2012
• Subjects: Animal Science and Zoology; Aquila chrysaetos; golden eagle
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10100-012-0003-y; http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/acro/33/154-155/article-p145.xml; https://www.sciendo.com/pdf/10.2478/v10100-012-0003-y

Abstract Despite the key role of raptors (including birds of prey Falconiformes and owls Strigiformes) in ecosystems and their sensitivity to environmental change, a well coordinated, Europe-wide monitoring of raptors is lacking. EURAPMON, a Research Networking Programme of the European Science Foundation, was launched with the aim of establishing a sustainable Europewide network for monitoring of raptors. An overview of current monitoring schemes for raptor populations in 28 European countries, as reported by EURAPMON National Coordinators at the workshop in Murcia (Spain) in 2012, showed existing monitoring schemes to be limited to a restricted number of species (mostly diurnal and rare raptor species). The most widely monitored species are the Golden Eagle Aquila chrysaetos amongst diurnal raptors and the Eagle Owl Bubo bubo amongst owls. Broad coverage of a species range across Europe is reached only for restricted-range species. The key driver for monitoring, which is mostly coordinated by NGOs, is conservation, and the main end users are governmental institutions. International collaboration in the field of monitoring of raptors is mainly regional and not yet pan-European in scale. The involvement of volunteers in raptor monitoring was perceived as the main strength of many schemes, but insufficient manpower and a focus on rare species were recognised as the main weaknesses across Europe as a whole. Among priorities identified for the future development of monitoring schemes are: improvements to national coordination; support to increase the number of volunteers; and assurances of stable funding. Further analysis of EURAPMON questionnaires will identify knowledge gaps, which will steer good practice guidance on survey methodologies; the need for the latter was identified as the main benefit that National Coordinators expect to gain from international networking