Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins

Abstract The origin of pinnipeds has been a contentious issue, with opposite sides debating monophyly or diphyly. This review uses evidence from the fossil record, combined with comparative morphology, molecular and cytogenetic investigations to evaluate the evolutionary history and phylogenetic rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vestnik Zoologii
Main Authors: Koretsky, I. A., Barnes, L. G., Rahmat, S. J.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040
http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/4/article-p327.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/vzoo.2016.50.issue-4/vzoo-2016-0040/vzoo-2016-0040.pdf
id crdegruyter:10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040
record_format openpolar
spelling crdegruyter:10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040 2023-05-15T17:34:39+02:00 Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins Koretsky, I. A. Barnes, L. G. Rahmat, S. J. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040 http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/4/article-p327.xml https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/vzoo.2016.50.issue-4/vzoo-2016-0040/vzoo-2016-0040.pdf unknown Walter de Gruyter GmbH http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 CC-BY-NC-ND Vestnik Zoologii volume 50, issue 4, page 327-354 ISSN 2073-2333 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2016 crdegruyter https://doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040 2022-06-16T13:41:57Z Abstract The origin of pinnipeds has been a contentious issue, with opposite sides debating monophyly or diphyly. This review uses evidence from the fossil record, combined with comparative morphology, molecular and cytogenetic investigations to evaluate the evolutionary history and phylogenetic relationships of living and fossil otarioid and phocoid pinnipeds. Molecular investigations support a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds, but disregard vital morphological data. Likewise, morphological studies support diphyly, but overlook molecular analyses. This review will demonstrate that a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds should not be completely accepted, as is the current ideology, and a diphyletic origin remains viable due to morphological and paleobiological analyses. Critical examination of certain characters, used by supporters of pinniped monophyly, reveals different polarities, variability, or simply convergence. The paleontological record and our morphological analysis of important characters supports a diphyletic origin of pinnipeds, with otarioids likely arising in the North Pacific from large, bear-like animals and phocids arising in the North Atlantic from smaller, otter-like ancestors. Although members of both groups are known by Late Oligocene time, each developed and invaded the aquatic environment separately from their much earlier, common arctoid ancestor. Therefore, we treat the superfamily Otarioidea as being monophyletic, including the families Enaliarctidae, Otariidae (fur seals/sea lions), Desmatophocidae, and Odobenidae (walruses and extinct relatives), and the superfamily Phocoidea as monophyletic, including only the family Phocidae, with four subfamilies (Devinophocinae, Phocinae, Monachinae, and Cystophorinae). Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic walrus* De Gruyter (via Crossref) Pacific Vestnik Zoologii 50 4 327 354
institution Open Polar
collection De Gruyter (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crdegruyter
language unknown
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Koretsky, I. A.
Barnes, L. G.
Rahmat, S. J.
Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract The origin of pinnipeds has been a contentious issue, with opposite sides debating monophyly or diphyly. This review uses evidence from the fossil record, combined with comparative morphology, molecular and cytogenetic investigations to evaluate the evolutionary history and phylogenetic relationships of living and fossil otarioid and phocoid pinnipeds. Molecular investigations support a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds, but disregard vital morphological data. Likewise, morphological studies support diphyly, but overlook molecular analyses. This review will demonstrate that a monophyletic origin of pinnipeds should not be completely accepted, as is the current ideology, and a diphyletic origin remains viable due to morphological and paleobiological analyses. Critical examination of certain characters, used by supporters of pinniped monophyly, reveals different polarities, variability, or simply convergence. The paleontological record and our morphological analysis of important characters supports a diphyletic origin of pinnipeds, with otarioids likely arising in the North Pacific from large, bear-like animals and phocids arising in the North Atlantic from smaller, otter-like ancestors. Although members of both groups are known by Late Oligocene time, each developed and invaded the aquatic environment separately from their much earlier, common arctoid ancestor. Therefore, we treat the superfamily Otarioidea as being monophyletic, including the families Enaliarctidae, Otariidae (fur seals/sea lions), Desmatophocidae, and Odobenidae (walruses and extinct relatives), and the superfamily Phocoidea as monophyletic, including only the family Phocidae, with four subfamilies (Devinophocinae, Phocinae, Monachinae, and Cystophorinae).
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Koretsky, I. A.
Barnes, L. G.
Rahmat, S. J.
author_facet Koretsky, I. A.
Barnes, L. G.
Rahmat, S. J.
author_sort Koretsky, I. A.
title Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
title_short Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
title_full Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
title_fullStr Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
title_full_unstemmed Re-Evaluation of Morphological Characters Questions Current Views of Pinniped Origins
title_sort re-evaluation of morphological characters questions current views of pinniped origins
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
publishDate 2016
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040
http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/4/article-p327.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/vzoo.2016.50.issue-4/vzoo-2016-0040/vzoo-2016-0040.pdf
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
walrus*
genre_facet North Atlantic
walrus*
op_source Vestnik Zoologii
volume 50, issue 4, page 327-354
ISSN 2073-2333
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/vzoo-2016-0040
container_title Vestnik Zoologii
container_volume 50
container_issue 4
container_start_page 327
op_container_end_page 354
_version_ 1766133560206426112