Critique of Reification of Art and Creativity in the Digital Age: A Lukácsian Approach to AI and NFT Art

• Published in: Open Philosophy
• Main Author: Poposki, Zoran
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2024
• Subjects: Terranova
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2024-0027; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2024-0027/xml; https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opphil-2024-0027/pdf

Abstract This article critically examines the emergent phenomena of AI-generated and NFT art through the lens of Georg Lukács’ theory of reification and its existential implications. Lukács argued that under capitalism, social relations and human experiences are transformed into objective, quantifiable commodities, leading to a fragmented and alienated consciousness. Applying this framework to AI and NFT art, these technologies can be said to represent extreme examples of the reification of art and creativity in the digital age. AI art generators reduce artistic production to abstract, computable properties divorced from lived experience, while NFTs transform digital art into speculative commodities, imposing the logic of private property and exchange value onto the previously open domain of online culture. The existential dimension of this reification is explored, raising questions about the nature of creativity, originality, and the value of art in an increasingly financialized and automated world. The article suggests that a Lukácsian critique must not only diagnose the reified character of these cultural forms but also identify their potential for resistance and transformation, pointing toward a re-humanized and emancipatory vision of art in the digital age. Contemporary theorists such as Tiziana Terranova, Nick Dyer-Witheford, and Benjamin Noys are invoked to further elucidate these issues.