Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry

Abstract We examined the feeding strategy of two dominant rodents, the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ) and the pygmy field mouse ( Apodemus uralensis ), in set-aside fields over a period of 1 year. Diet analysis revealed dominance of green plant shoots in common vole’s diet and seeds in the diet of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mammalia
Main Authors: Heroldova, Marta, Janova, Eva
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mamm.2019.83.issue-1/mammalia-2017-0106/mammalia-2017-0106.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/pdf
id crdegruyter:10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106
record_format openpolar
spelling crdegruyter:10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106 2023-05-15T15:56:24+02:00 Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry Heroldova, Marta Janova, Eva 2018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106 http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mamm.2019.83.issue-1/mammalia-2017-0106/mammalia-2017-0106.xml https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/xml https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/pdf en eng Walter de Gruyter GmbH Mammalia volume 83, issue 1, page 34-40 ISSN 1864-1547 0025-1461 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 2018 crdegruyter https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106 2022-06-16T13:41:06Z Abstract We examined the feeding strategy of two dominant rodents, the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ) and the pygmy field mouse ( Apodemus uralensis ), in set-aside fields over a period of 1 year. Diet analysis revealed dominance of green plant shoots in common vole’s diet and seeds in the diet of the pygmy field mouse. Food availability in the set-aside fields was strongly correlated with the diet of the herbivorous common vole, but not with that of the granivorous pygmy-field mouse. Both feeding strategies reflect specific morphological adaptations of the digestive tract of both species. A comparison of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT; length and mass without oesophagus; including contents) of the common vole and pygmy field mouse revealed a correlation between body size and length and the GIT weight in both species. The common vole had a proportionally heavier GIT with a larger of the common vole and pygmy field mouse relative proportion of caecum. The GIT length was proportionally greater in juvenile females, while the GIT weight was greater in adult females of both species. The GIT morphometry of both species varied with season and reproductive status, presumably as food consumed altered in line with vegetation phenology and the rodent’s energy requirements. Article in Journal/Newspaper Common vole Microtus arvalis De Gruyter (via Crossref) Mammalia 83 1 34 40
institution Open Polar
collection De Gruyter (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crdegruyter
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Heroldova, Marta
Janova, Eva
Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description Abstract We examined the feeding strategy of two dominant rodents, the common vole ( Microtus arvalis ) and the pygmy field mouse ( Apodemus uralensis ), in set-aside fields over a period of 1 year. Diet analysis revealed dominance of green plant shoots in common vole’s diet and seeds in the diet of the pygmy field mouse. Food availability in the set-aside fields was strongly correlated with the diet of the herbivorous common vole, but not with that of the granivorous pygmy-field mouse. Both feeding strategies reflect specific morphological adaptations of the digestive tract of both species. A comparison of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT; length and mass without oesophagus; including contents) of the common vole and pygmy field mouse revealed a correlation between body size and length and the GIT weight in both species. The common vole had a proportionally heavier GIT with a larger of the common vole and pygmy field mouse relative proportion of caecum. The GIT length was proportionally greater in juvenile females, while the GIT weight was greater in adult females of both species. The GIT morphometry of both species varied with season and reproductive status, presumably as food consumed altered in line with vegetation phenology and the rodent’s energy requirements.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Heroldova, Marta
Janova, Eva
author_facet Heroldova, Marta
Janova, Eva
author_sort Heroldova, Marta
title Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
title_short Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
title_full Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
title_fullStr Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
title_full_unstemmed Feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
title_sort feeding strategy of two rodent species in a set-aside field and its influence on alimentary tract morphometry
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
publishDate 2018
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/mamm.2019.83.issue-1/mammalia-2017-0106/mammalia-2017-0106.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106/pdf
genre Common vole
Microtus arvalis
genre_facet Common vole
Microtus arvalis
op_source Mammalia
volume 83, issue 1, page 34-40
ISSN 1864-1547 0025-1461
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0106
container_title Mammalia
container_volume 83
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
op_container_end_page 40
_version_ 1766391832375197696