Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)

Abstract For everyone involved in the governance and economics of science and technology the subject becomes more and more complicated. Today's scientific news is increasingly faster replaced by even more astonishing news. New science and technology (S&T) fields and new S&T ‘buzzwords’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of International Biotechnology Law
Main Author: Wolbring, Gregor
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2007.026
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JIBL.2007.026/pdf
id crdegruyter:10.1515/jibl.2007.026
record_format openpolar
spelling crdegruyter:10.1515/jibl.2007.026 2023-05-15T16:53:40+02:00 Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I) Wolbring, Gregor 2007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2007.026 https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JIBL.2007.026/pdf unknown Walter de Gruyter GmbH Journal of International Biotechnology Law volume 4, issue 5 ISSN 1612-6068 General Medicine journal-article 2007 crdegruyter https://doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2007.026 2022-04-14T05:02:04Z Abstract For everyone involved in the governance and economics of science and technology the subject becomes more and more complicated. Today's scientific news is increasingly faster replaced by even more astonishing news. New science and technology (S&T) fields and new S&T ‘buzzwords’ appear at an ever-increasing speed. ‘Biotech’ and genetic engineering are buzzwords for many decades with 43,000,000 and 2,230,000 Google hits respectively. In the last few years nanotechnology joined the rank of buzzwords with already 16,300,000 Google hits. The nano-visibility increase influenced the appearance of nano-bio fusion terms and vice versa. Nanobiotechnology generates 538,000; nanobiotechnology 603,000 and nanobio-technology 539,000 Google hits. DNA-Nanotechnology produces 35,700 hits. ‘Synthetic biology’ (synbio) stormed onto the scene in the last two years with already 964,000 Google hits. As the popularity of synbio increases one can expect ‘Nano-synthetic biology’, ‘Nano-synbiotechnology’ or similar terms to increasingly appear. In June 2007 a meeting created the ”Ilulissat Statement Synthesizing the Future a vision for the convergence of synthetic biology and nanotechnology”. The increasing appearance of fusion terms fits the increased move towards and discourse about converging different sciences and technologies. One influential event in this regards was the 2001 National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce (USA) workshop ””Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information technology and Cognitive science (NBIC): Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance”. which coined the term NBIC. The workshop stated: ”The integration and synergy of the four technologies (nano-bio-info-cogno) originate from the nanoscale, where the building blocks of matter are established.” Article in Journal/Newspaper Ilulissat De Gruyter (via Crossref) Ilulissat ENVELOPE(-51.099,-51.099,69.220,69.220) Journal of International Biotechnology Law 4 5
institution Open Polar
collection De Gruyter (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crdegruyter
language unknown
topic General Medicine
spellingShingle General Medicine
Wolbring, Gregor
Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
topic_facet General Medicine
description Abstract For everyone involved in the governance and economics of science and technology the subject becomes more and more complicated. Today's scientific news is increasingly faster replaced by even more astonishing news. New science and technology (S&T) fields and new S&T ‘buzzwords’ appear at an ever-increasing speed. ‘Biotech’ and genetic engineering are buzzwords for many decades with 43,000,000 and 2,230,000 Google hits respectively. In the last few years nanotechnology joined the rank of buzzwords with already 16,300,000 Google hits. The nano-visibility increase influenced the appearance of nano-bio fusion terms and vice versa. Nanobiotechnology generates 538,000; nanobiotechnology 603,000 and nanobio-technology 539,000 Google hits. DNA-Nanotechnology produces 35,700 hits. ‘Synthetic biology’ (synbio) stormed onto the scene in the last two years with already 964,000 Google hits. As the popularity of synbio increases one can expect ‘Nano-synthetic biology’, ‘Nano-synbiotechnology’ or similar terms to increasingly appear. In June 2007 a meeting created the ”Ilulissat Statement Synthesizing the Future a vision for the convergence of synthetic biology and nanotechnology”. The increasing appearance of fusion terms fits the increased move towards and discourse about converging different sciences and technologies. One influential event in this regards was the 2001 National Science Foundation and Department of Commerce (USA) workshop ””Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information technology and Cognitive science (NBIC): Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance”. which coined the term NBIC. The workshop stated: ”The integration and synergy of the four technologies (nano-bio-info-cogno) originate from the nanoscale, where the building blocks of matter are established.”
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wolbring, Gregor
author_facet Wolbring, Gregor
author_sort Wolbring, Gregor
title Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
title_short Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
title_full Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
title_fullStr Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
title_full_unstemmed Bio-tech, NanoBio-Tech, SynBio-tech, NanoSynBio-tech? The changing face of biotech law? (Part I)
title_sort bio-tech, nanobio-tech, synbio-tech, nanosynbio-tech? the changing face of biotech law? (part i)
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
publishDate 2007
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2007.026
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/JIBL.2007.026/pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-51.099,-51.099,69.220,69.220)
geographic Ilulissat
geographic_facet Ilulissat
genre Ilulissat
genre_facet Ilulissat
op_source Journal of International Biotechnology Law
volume 4, issue 5
ISSN 1612-6068
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2007.026
container_title Journal of International Biotechnology Law
container_volume 4
container_issue 5
_version_ 1766044255003869184