Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development

Abstract This paper re-evaluates hypotheses about the agreement behaviour of nouns using plural suffixes in the Baïnounk languages (Niger Congo/ Atlantic/ North Atlantic). Although these languages dispose of a large and complex prefixing noun class systems which are involved in expressing number dis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
Main Author: Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: Walter de Gruyter GmbH 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jall-2017-0007
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jall.2017.38.issue-2/jall-2017-0007/jall-2017-0007.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall-2017-0007/pdf
id crdegruyter:10.1515/jall-2017-0007
record_format openpolar
spelling crdegruyter:10.1515/jall-2017-0007 2024-09-15T18:23:34+00:00 Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development Cobbinah, Alexander Yao 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jall-2017-0007 http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jall.2017.38.issue-2/jall-2017-0007/jall-2017-0007.xml https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall-2017-0007/pdf unknown Walter de Gruyter GmbH Journal of African Languages and Linguistics volume 38, issue 2 ISSN 0167-6164 1613-3811 journal-article 2017 crdegruyter https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2017-0007 2024-07-01T04:08:51Z Abstract This paper re-evaluates hypotheses about the agreement behaviour of nouns using plural suffixes in the Baïnounk languages (Niger Congo/ Atlantic/ North Atlantic). Although these languages dispose of a large and complex prefixing noun class systems which are involved in expressing number distinctions, a subgroup of nouns uses a suffix for pluralisation. It is shown here that plural-suffixing nouns do not engage in the typologically rare process of phonological agreement copying as has been claimed previously. Instead, they are prefixed nouns, triggering alliterative agreement. Several scenarios about the origin and further development of the plural suffixes are presented. Synchronic data suggest that plural suffixes are older than the split of Nyun-Buy languages from a common ancestor. It is highly unlikely that it is borrowed from Mandinka, a regionally influential lingua franca which does not have noun classes. Instead, it seems plausible that plural suffixes have arisen through internal processes in which animacy and collective semantics have played a role. Potential candidates for a source morpheme for the plural suffix include a plural morpheme from the verbal domain or alternatively an associative plural. The role and impact of language contact and large scale borrowing on the extent of plural suffixation in the various Baïnounk languages is discussed. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic De Gruyter Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38 2
institution Open Polar
collection De Gruyter
op_collection_id crdegruyter
language unknown
description Abstract This paper re-evaluates hypotheses about the agreement behaviour of nouns using plural suffixes in the Baïnounk languages (Niger Congo/ Atlantic/ North Atlantic). Although these languages dispose of a large and complex prefixing noun class systems which are involved in expressing number distinctions, a subgroup of nouns uses a suffix for pluralisation. It is shown here that plural-suffixing nouns do not engage in the typologically rare process of phonological agreement copying as has been claimed previously. Instead, they are prefixed nouns, triggering alliterative agreement. Several scenarios about the origin and further development of the plural suffixes are presented. Synchronic data suggest that plural suffixes are older than the split of Nyun-Buy languages from a common ancestor. It is highly unlikely that it is borrowed from Mandinka, a regionally influential lingua franca which does not have noun classes. Instead, it seems plausible that plural suffixes have arisen through internal processes in which animacy and collective semantics have played a role. Potential candidates for a source morpheme for the plural suffix include a plural morpheme from the verbal domain or alternatively an associative plural. The role and impact of language contact and large scale borrowing on the extent of plural suffixation in the various Baïnounk languages is discussed.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
spellingShingle Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
author_facet Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
author_sort Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
title Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
title_short Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
title_full Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
title_fullStr Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
title_full_unstemmed Suffixed plurals in Baïnonk languages: Agreement patterns and diachronic development
title_sort suffixed plurals in baïnonk languages: agreement patterns and diachronic development
publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH
publishDate 2017
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jall-2017-0007
http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/jall.2017.38.issue-2/jall-2017-0007/jall-2017-0007.xml
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/jall-2017-0007/pdf
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
volume 38, issue 2
ISSN 0167-6164 1613-3811
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1515/jall-2017-0007
container_title Journal of African Languages and Linguistics
container_volume 38
container_issue 2
_version_ 1810463802598096896