Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?

Statistical reforms in psychology and surrounding domains have been largely motivated by doubts surrounding the methodological and statistical rigor of researchers. In light of high rates of p-value misunderstandings, against the backdrop systematically raised criticisms of NHST, some authors have d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance, Heene, Moritz, Lakens, Daniel, Ufer, Stefan
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Center for Open Science 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9
id crcenteros:10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9
record_format openpolar
spelling crcenteros:10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9 2023-09-05T13:19:55+02:00 Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors? Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance Heene, Moritz Lakens, Daniel Ufer, Stefan 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9 unknown Center for Open Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode posted-content 2020 crcenteros https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9 2023-08-18T12:45:29Z Statistical reforms in psychology and surrounding domains have been largely motivated by doubts surrounding the methodological and statistical rigor of researchers. In light of high rates of p-value misunderstandings, against the backdrop systematically raised criticisms of NHST, some authors have deemed misconceptions about p-value “impervious to correction” (Haller & Krauss, 2002, p. 1), while others have advocated for the entire abandonment of statistical significance in place of alternative methods of inference (e.g., Amrhein, Greenland, & McShane, 2019). Surprisingly little work, however, has empirically investigated the extent to which statistical misconceptions can be improved reliably within individuals, nor whether these improvements are transient or maintained. The current study (N = 2,320) evaluated baseline misconception rates of p-value, confidence interval, and Bayes factor interpretations among online learners, as well as rates of improvement in accuracy across an 8-week massive open online course (MOOC). Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in accuracy rates, across all three concepts, for immediate learning (first post-test), as well as support for retained learning until week 8 (second post-test). The current work challenges the idea that statistical misconceptions are impervious to correction, and highlights the importance of pinpointing those more problematic misunderstandings that may warrant more efforts to support improvement. Before we abandon one of the most widely used approaches to statistical inferences in place of an alternative, it is worth exploring whether it is first possible to improve existing misunderstandings amid current methods used. Other/Unknown Material Greenland COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref) Greenland Haller ENVELOPE(-62.102,-62.102,-64.055,-64.055)
institution Open Polar
collection COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcenteros
language unknown
description Statistical reforms in psychology and surrounding domains have been largely motivated by doubts surrounding the methodological and statistical rigor of researchers. In light of high rates of p-value misunderstandings, against the backdrop systematically raised criticisms of NHST, some authors have deemed misconceptions about p-value “impervious to correction” (Haller & Krauss, 2002, p. 1), while others have advocated for the entire abandonment of statistical significance in place of alternative methods of inference (e.g., Amrhein, Greenland, & McShane, 2019). Surprisingly little work, however, has empirically investigated the extent to which statistical misconceptions can be improved reliably within individuals, nor whether these improvements are transient or maintained. The current study (N = 2,320) evaluated baseline misconception rates of p-value, confidence interval, and Bayes factor interpretations among online learners, as well as rates of improvement in accuracy across an 8-week massive open online course (MOOC). Results demonstrated statistically significant improvements in accuracy rates, across all three concepts, for immediate learning (first post-test), as well as support for retained learning until week 8 (second post-test). The current work challenges the idea that statistical misconceptions are impervious to correction, and highlights the importance of pinpointing those more problematic misunderstandings that may warrant more efforts to support improvement. Before we abandon one of the most widely used approaches to statistical inferences in place of an alternative, it is worth exploring whether it is first possible to improve existing misunderstandings amid current methods used.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance
Heene, Moritz
Lakens, Daniel
Ufer, Stefan
spellingShingle Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance
Heene, Moritz
Lakens, Daniel
Ufer, Stefan
Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
author_facet Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance
Heene, Moritz
Lakens, Daniel
Ufer, Stefan
author_sort Herrera-Bennett, Arianne Constance
title Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
title_short Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
title_full Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
title_fullStr Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
title_full_unstemmed Improving statistical inferences: Can a MOOC reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and Bayes factors?
title_sort improving statistical inferences: can a mooc reduce statistical misconceptions about p-values, confidence intervals, and bayes factors?
publisher Center for Open Science
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9
long_lat ENVELOPE(-62.102,-62.102,-64.055,-64.055)
geographic Greenland
Haller
geographic_facet Greenland
Haller
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zt3g9
_version_ 1776200691655639040