INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS

This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods.Purpose and Methods: In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danko, Tamara, Kiselev, Vladimir, Maximov, Denis, Rakauskienė, Ona Gražina
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Center for Open Science 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3
id crcenteros:10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3
record_format openpolar
spelling crcenteros:10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3 2023-05-15T14:47:09+02:00 INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS Danko, Tamara Kiselev, Vladimir Maximov, Denis Rakauskienė, Ona Gražina 2022 http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3 unknown Center for Open Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode CC-BY posted-content 2022 crcenteros https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3 2022-12-20T10:10:17Z This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods.Purpose and Methods: In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors (the neighboring countries Norway and Sweden), a comparative analysis was carried out using the index (coefficient) of innovative development of all these research subjects. The study also included the comparison of the parameters that make up its categories (enlarged group indicators) and subcategories (single indicators included in the categories). The analysis used data from the. The results of the comparative analysis showed that for most of the studied indicators included in the subcategories ('labor productivity', 'foundation of new enterprises', 'certification', 'high-tech production', etc.), Russia lags far behind Norway and Sweden. Russia's advantages lie in such subcategories as the development of innovative links between universities and the industrial sector in R&D, trade, diversification, and scope of market. Russia also successfully competes in such subcategories as business environment formation and creation of information and communication technologies. It was noted that these areas are promising for Russia and they should be given great attention to increase the competitiveness of Russia's Arctic. In conclusion, it is supposed that Russia has significant triggers for its competitiveness in the near future along with the significant lag from the analyzed Arctic neighbors in terms of the integral value of the innovation development index and its place in the world ranking. Other/Unknown Material Arctic COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref) Arctic Norway
institution Open Polar
collection COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcenteros
language unknown
description This study presents a comparative analysis of innovative development, advantages and threats of the Arctic zones belonging to Russia, Norway and Sweden by rating positioning using mathematical analysis methods.Purpose and Methods: In order to determine the strengths and weaknesses of Russia among its Arctic competitors (the neighboring countries Norway and Sweden), a comparative analysis was carried out using the index (coefficient) of innovative development of all these research subjects. The study also included the comparison of the parameters that make up its categories (enlarged group indicators) and subcategories (single indicators included in the categories). The analysis used data from the. The results of the comparative analysis showed that for most of the studied indicators included in the subcategories ('labor productivity', 'foundation of new enterprises', 'certification', 'high-tech production', etc.), Russia lags far behind Norway and Sweden. Russia's advantages lie in such subcategories as the development of innovative links between universities and the industrial sector in R&D, trade, diversification, and scope of market. Russia also successfully competes in such subcategories as business environment formation and creation of information and communication technologies. It was noted that these areas are promising for Russia and they should be given great attention to increase the competitiveness of Russia's Arctic. In conclusion, it is supposed that Russia has significant triggers for its competitiveness in the near future along with the significant lag from the analyzed Arctic neighbors in terms of the integral value of the innovation development index and its place in the world ranking.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Danko, Tamara
Kiselev, Vladimir
Maximov, Denis
Rakauskienė, Ona Gražina
spellingShingle Danko, Tamara
Kiselev, Vladimir
Maximov, Denis
Rakauskienė, Ona Gražina
INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
author_facet Danko, Tamara
Kiselev, Vladimir
Maximov, Denis
Rakauskienė, Ona Gražina
author_sort Danko, Tamara
title INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
title_short INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
title_full INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
title_fullStr INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
title_full_unstemmed INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARCTIC TERRITORIES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF ENSURING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS
title_sort innovative development of the arctic territories in the framework of ensuring national competitiveness
publisher Center for Open Science
publishDate 2022
url http://dx.doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3
geographic Arctic
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/k9dh3
_version_ 1766318290148261888