Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task

Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are extremely adept in interpreting human-given cues, such as the pointing gesture. However, the underlying mechanisms on how domestic non-companion species use these cues are not well understood. We investigated the use of human-given pointing gestures by goats (Capra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nawroth, Christian, Martin, Zoe, McElligott, Alan G.
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:unknown
Published: Center for Open Science 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x
id crcenteros:10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x
record_format openpolar
spelling crcenteros:10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x 2023-05-15T15:50:54+02:00 Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task Nawroth, Christian Martin, Zoe McElligott, Alan G. 2020 http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x unknown Center for Open Science https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode CC-BY posted-content 2020 crcenteros https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x 2022-12-20T10:09:46Z Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are extremely adept in interpreting human-given cues, such as the pointing gesture. However, the underlying mechanisms on how domestic non-companion species use these cues are not well understood. We investigated the use of human-given pointing gestures by goats (Capra hircus) in an object-choice task, where an experimenter surreptitiously hid food in one of two buckets. Subjects first had to pass a pre-test where the experimenter indicated the location of the food to the subject by a proximal pointing gesture. Subjects that succeeded in the use of this gesture were transferred to the actual test. In these subsequent test trials, the experimenter indicated the location of the food to the subject by using three different pointing gestures: proximal pointing from a middle position (distance between target and index finger: 30 cm), crossed pointing from the middle position (distance between target and index finger: 40 cm), asymmetric pointing from the position of the non-baited bucket (distance between target and index finger: 90 cm). Goats succeeded in the pointing gestures that presented an element of proximity (proximal and crossed) compared to when the experimenter was further away from the rewarded location (asymmetric). This indicates that goats can generalise their use of the human pointing gesture but might rely on stimulus/local enhancement rather than referential information. In addition, goats did not improve their responses over time, indicating that no learning took place. The results provide a greater understanding of human-animal interactions and social-cognitive abilities of livestock, which allows for the provision of enhanced management practices and welfare conditions. Other/Unknown Material Canis lupus COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref)
institution Open Polar
collection COS Center for Open Science (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcenteros
language unknown
description Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) are extremely adept in interpreting human-given cues, such as the pointing gesture. However, the underlying mechanisms on how domestic non-companion species use these cues are not well understood. We investigated the use of human-given pointing gestures by goats (Capra hircus) in an object-choice task, where an experimenter surreptitiously hid food in one of two buckets. Subjects first had to pass a pre-test where the experimenter indicated the location of the food to the subject by a proximal pointing gesture. Subjects that succeeded in the use of this gesture were transferred to the actual test. In these subsequent test trials, the experimenter indicated the location of the food to the subject by using three different pointing gestures: proximal pointing from a middle position (distance between target and index finger: 30 cm), crossed pointing from the middle position (distance between target and index finger: 40 cm), asymmetric pointing from the position of the non-baited bucket (distance between target and index finger: 90 cm). Goats succeeded in the pointing gestures that presented an element of proximity (proximal and crossed) compared to when the experimenter was further away from the rewarded location (asymmetric). This indicates that goats can generalise their use of the human pointing gesture but might rely on stimulus/local enhancement rather than referential information. In addition, goats did not improve their responses over time, indicating that no learning took place. The results provide a greater understanding of human-animal interactions and social-cognitive abilities of livestock, which allows for the provision of enhanced management practices and welfare conditions.
format Other/Unknown Material
author Nawroth, Christian
Martin, Zoe
McElligott, Alan G.
spellingShingle Nawroth, Christian
Martin, Zoe
McElligott, Alan G.
Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
author_facet Nawroth, Christian
Martin, Zoe
McElligott, Alan G.
author_sort Nawroth, Christian
title Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
title_short Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
title_full Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
title_fullStr Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
title_full_unstemmed Goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
title_sort goats follow human pointing gestures in an object choice task
publisher Center for Open Science
publishDate 2020
url http://dx.doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/uwd6x
_version_ 1766385921064697856