Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment

We compared the use of space and habitat by wolverines, Gulo gulo, and arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, on the Snøhetta plateau and surrounding mountains in south-central Norway. The arctic foxes used smaller annual home ranges than the wolverines, whose home ranges were among the largest yet reported...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Authors: Landa, Arild, Strand, Olav, Linnell, John DC, Skogland, Terje
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-209
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-209
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z97-209
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z97-209 2024-03-03T08:36:31+00:00 Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment Landa, Arild Strand, Olav Linnell, John DC Skogland, Terje 1998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-209 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-209 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 76, issue 3, page 448-457 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1998 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-209 2024-02-07T10:53:34Z We compared the use of space and habitat by wolverines, Gulo gulo, and arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, on the Snøhetta plateau and surrounding mountains in south-central Norway. The arctic foxes used smaller annual home ranges than the wolverines, whose home ranges were among the largest yet reported for the species. In both species, resident males used larger home ranges than resident females. Arctic foxes used a much narrower, and higher, range of altitudes than wolverines, always above the tree line. Wolverines used lower altitudes in winter than in summer. Female wolverines showed pronounced seasonal peaks in their use of the peripheral areas of their home ranges. Both species showed an ability to cross at least some transportation corridors (road, rail, human settlements) in the area. The habitat available at Snøhetta appears suitable for arctic foxes and does not explain the failure of the population to recover during 67 years of protection. Because of predation on domestic sheep, wolverines will probably be confined to a series of core conservation areas (CCA). At present densities (0.28-0.36 wolverines per 100 km 2 ), the CCA surrounding Snøhetta can contain from 36 to 50 wolverines. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alopex lagopus Arctic Gulo gulo Canadian Science Publishing Arctic Norway Snøhetta ENVELOPE(-2.783,-2.783,-72.183,-72.183) Canadian Journal of Zoology 76 3 448 457
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Landa, Arild
Strand, Olav
Linnell, John DC
Skogland, Terje
Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description We compared the use of space and habitat by wolverines, Gulo gulo, and arctic foxes, Alopex lagopus, on the Snøhetta plateau and surrounding mountains in south-central Norway. The arctic foxes used smaller annual home ranges than the wolverines, whose home ranges were among the largest yet reported for the species. In both species, resident males used larger home ranges than resident females. Arctic foxes used a much narrower, and higher, range of altitudes than wolverines, always above the tree line. Wolverines used lower altitudes in winter than in summer. Female wolverines showed pronounced seasonal peaks in their use of the peripheral areas of their home ranges. Both species showed an ability to cross at least some transportation corridors (road, rail, human settlements) in the area. The habitat available at Snøhetta appears suitable for arctic foxes and does not explain the failure of the population to recover during 67 years of protection. Because of predation on domestic sheep, wolverines will probably be confined to a series of core conservation areas (CCA). At present densities (0.28-0.36 wolverines per 100 km 2 ), the CCA surrounding Snøhetta can contain from 36 to 50 wolverines.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Landa, Arild
Strand, Olav
Linnell, John DC
Skogland, Terje
author_facet Landa, Arild
Strand, Olav
Linnell, John DC
Skogland, Terje
author_sort Landa, Arild
title Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
title_short Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
title_full Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
title_fullStr Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
title_full_unstemmed Home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
title_sort home-range sizes and altitude selection for arctic foxes and wolverines in an alpine environment
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-209
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-209
long_lat ENVELOPE(-2.783,-2.783,-72.183,-72.183)
geographic Arctic
Norway
Snøhetta
geographic_facet Arctic
Norway
Snøhetta
genre Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Gulo gulo
genre_facet Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Gulo gulo
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 76, issue 3, page 448-457
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-209
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 76
container_issue 3
container_start_page 448
op_container_end_page 457
_version_ 1792507166061494272