Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations

The costs of pregnancy and lactation in terms of subsequent body growth and fecundity were studied by comparing different reproductive categories of Swedish female moose (Alces alces) during 1989-1992. Non-reproducing females and females that experienced gestation but not lactation were significantl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Canadian Journal of Zoology
Main Author: Sand, Håkan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Canadian Science Publishing 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-181
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-181
id crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z97-181
record_format openpolar
spelling crcansciencepubl:10.1139/z97-181 2023-12-17T10:18:01+01:00 Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations Sand, Håkan 1998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-181 http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-181 en eng Canadian Science Publishing http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining Canadian Journal of Zoology volume 76, issue 1, page 187-193 ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283 Animal Science and Zoology Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics journal-article 1998 crcansciencepubl https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-181 2023-11-19T13:39:11Z The costs of pregnancy and lactation in terms of subsequent body growth and fecundity were studied by comparing different reproductive categories of Swedish female moose (Alces alces) during 1989-1992. Non-reproducing females and females that experienced gestation but not lactation were significantly heavier than females in the same reproductive category prior to reproduction. Production of one offspring and subsequent lactation during the summer and early autumn were also associated with an average annual increase in carcass mass, although this was less pronounced than in females that only experienced gestation. By contrast, production of two offspring and successful rearing of both to the autumn resulted, on average, in a reduction of carcass mass (7%) relative to that of females in the same reproductive category prior to reproduction. In female moose, while body growth was affected by the costs of lactation, future fecundity was not. Instead, future fecundity was related most strongly to the number of offspring produced during the current year. This positive association could not be attributed to variation in individual quality in terms of age or carcass mass. The ultimate consequences of reproduction in female moose seem to strongly influence the patterns of growth: adult females will alternate between gain and loss of body mass among years, depending on the number of offspring produced and successfully reared through the lactation phase. Article in Journal/Newspaper Alces alces Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref) Canadian Journal of Zoology 76 1 187 193
institution Open Polar
collection Canadian Science Publishing (via Crossref)
op_collection_id crcansciencepubl
language English
topic Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
spellingShingle Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Sand, Håkan
Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
topic_facet Animal Science and Zoology
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
description The costs of pregnancy and lactation in terms of subsequent body growth and fecundity were studied by comparing different reproductive categories of Swedish female moose (Alces alces) during 1989-1992. Non-reproducing females and females that experienced gestation but not lactation were significantly heavier than females in the same reproductive category prior to reproduction. Production of one offspring and subsequent lactation during the summer and early autumn were also associated with an average annual increase in carcass mass, although this was less pronounced than in females that only experienced gestation. By contrast, production of two offspring and successful rearing of both to the autumn resulted, on average, in a reduction of carcass mass (7%) relative to that of females in the same reproductive category prior to reproduction. In female moose, while body growth was affected by the costs of lactation, future fecundity was not. Instead, future fecundity was related most strongly to the number of offspring produced during the current year. This positive association could not be attributed to variation in individual quality in terms of age or carcass mass. The ultimate consequences of reproduction in female moose seem to strongly influence the patterns of growth: adult females will alternate between gain and loss of body mass among years, depending on the number of offspring produced and successfully reared through the lactation phase.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Sand, Håkan
author_facet Sand, Håkan
author_sort Sand, Håkan
title Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
title_short Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
title_full Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
title_fullStr Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
title_full_unstemmed Costs of reproduction in female moose ( Alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
title_sort costs of reproduction in female moose ( alces alces ) as measured by means of phenotypic correlations
publisher Canadian Science Publishing
publishDate 1998
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z97-181
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/pdf/10.1139/z97-181
genre Alces alces
genre_facet Alces alces
op_source Canadian Journal of Zoology
volume 76, issue 1, page 187-193
ISSN 0008-4301 1480-3283
op_rights http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/z97-181
container_title Canadian Journal of Zoology
container_volume 76
container_issue 1
container_start_page 187
op_container_end_page 193
_version_ 1785535032580898816